便携式睡眠监测仪对新生儿重度喉软化声门上成形术疗效评估研究

林家惠, 夏忠芳. 便携式睡眠监测仪对新生儿重度喉软化声门上成形术疗效评估研究[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2024, 38(11): 1066-1070. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.11.013
引用本文: 林家惠, 夏忠芳. 便携式睡眠监测仪对新生儿重度喉软化声门上成形术疗效评估研究[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2024, 38(11): 1066-1070. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.11.013
LIN Jiahui, XIA Zhongfang. Evaluation of a portable sleep monitor for the postoperative efficacy of supraglottoplasty in neonates with severe laryngomalacia[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2024, 38(11): 1066-1070. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.11.013
Citation: LIN Jiahui, XIA Zhongfang. Evaluation of a portable sleep monitor for the postoperative efficacy of supraglottoplasty in neonates with severe laryngomalacia[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2024, 38(11): 1066-1070. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.11.013

便携式睡眠监测仪对新生儿重度喉软化声门上成形术疗效评估研究

  • 基金项目:
    武汉市卫生计生委科研计划资助项目(No:WX21D77)
详细信息

Evaluation of a portable sleep monitor for the postoperative efficacy of supraglottoplasty in neonates with severe laryngomalacia

More Information
  • 目的  探讨便携式睡眠监测仪(portable monitor divice,PMD)是否可以用于评估新生儿重度喉软化(laryngomalacia,LM)行声门上成形术(supraglottoplasty,SGP)的疗效。 方法  回顾性分析2020年1月至2023年11月院诊治的11例重度LM新生儿,均行全麻下SGP,并在术前术后行床旁PMD监测,比较术前术后的睡眠监测指标的变化,应用SPSS 18.0统计学软件,采用Wilcoxon符号轶和检验,P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。 结果  11例患儿术后1周,阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气指数(OAHI)、阻塞性呼吸暂停指数(OAI)、氧减指数(ODI)均低于术前,最低血氧饱和度(SpO2)高于术前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),睡眠呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)和术前比较差异无统计学意义;术后1个月,AHI、OAHI、OAI、ODI均低于术前,最低SpO2、平均SpO2均高于术前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论  PMD检查的部分参数可用于评估新生儿重度LM的SGP的疗效,是新生儿LM病情评估的重要辅助手段。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  手术前后电子喉镜图像

    表 1  手术前后患儿症状比较

    时间 喉喘鸣 呼吸困难 喂养困难
    明显 轻度 发绀 明显三凹征 轻度三凹征 高碳酸血症 鼻饲 呛奶 吐奶
    术前 11 0 0 3 8 3 5 7 4 3
    术后1周 3 8 0 0 2 9 0 5 2 2
    术后1个月 0 11 0 0 0 3 0 2 1 0
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  手术前后睡眠监测指数中位数比较 M(P25P75)

    监测项目 术前 术后1周 术后1个月 Z
    中位数 中位数 Z 中位数 Z
    AHI/(次/h) 28.9(26.2,35.1) 27.5(25.3,30.2) -1.957 14.3(12.4,15.4) -2.934 -1.992
    OAHI/(次/h) 21.8(17.8,24.3) 13.8(12.8,19.8) -2.934 3.7(2.8,5.6) -2.934 -2.201
    CAI/(次/h) 9.6(8.1,11.4) 9.1(8.5,11.1) -0.356 9.4(8.1,10.3) -1.912 -0.315
    OAI/(次/h) 8.5(7.3,8.8) 6.2(4.1,6.3) -2.845 2.3(1.3,2.7) -2.940 -2.201
    MAI/(次/h) 1.8(1.3,2.8) 1.7(1.2,2.4) -0.679 1.4(1.2,2.3) -1.876 -1.261
    最低SPO2/% 79.0(73.0,82.0) 82.0(77.0,84.0) -2.671 84.0(83.0,85.0) -2.814 -2.214
    平均SPO2/% 92.5(91.3,94.2) 93.6(92.2,94.1) -1.600 95.3(94.8,95.3) -2.938 -1.572
    ODI/(次/h) 16.9(15.5,20.3) 7.4(5.8,9.4) -2.934 3.5(2.1,5.3) -2.936 -2.201
    平均心率/(次/min) 138.5(135.6,140.0) 139.7(134.5,146.5) -1.600 137.2(135.8,140.8) -1.779 -0.943
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  便携式睡眠监测仪与传统评估方法比较

    项目 PMD 喉镜 脉搏SPO2 心电监护 血气分析
    有创检查
    可床边操作
    有电子存档
    可持续监测
    软件分析
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    中国妇幼保健学会微创分会儿童耳鼻咽喉学组. 儿童喉软化症诊断与治疗临床实践指南[J]. 临床耳鼻咽头颈外科杂志, 2020, 34(11): 961-965.

    [2]

    刘晓君, 李晓艳. 喉软化症的发病机制及相关疾病研究进展[J]. 国际耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2019, 43(5): 260-263. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4106.2019.05.004

    [3]

    Gan RWC, Moustafa A, Turner K, et al. Histopathology of laryngomalacia[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2021, 141(1): 85-88. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2020.1821246

    [4]

    Sivarajah S, Isaac A, Anderson S, et al. Validity of laryngomalacia classification systems: a multi-institutional agreement study[J]. Clin Otolaryngol, 2020, 45(4): 471-476. doi: 10.1111/coa.13530

    [5]

    Cialente F, Meucci D, Tropiano ML, et al. Changes in breathing patterns after surgery in severe laryngomalacia[J]. Children(Basel), 2021, 8(12): 1120.

    [6]

    Miller C, Parikh SR. Does supraglottoplasty improve outcomes in children with laryngomalacia?[J]. Laryngoscope, 2019, 129(2): 285-287. doi: 10.1002/lary.27127

    [7]

    Alshumrani RA, Matt BH, Daftary AS, et al. Correlation between the clinical severity of laryngomalacia and endoscopic findings[J]. Saudi Med J, 2020, 41(4): 406-412. doi: 10.15537/smj.2020.4.25014

    [8]

    Cortes MC, Villamor P, de la Torre González C, et al. Complete polysomnographic parameters in infants with severe laryngomalacia prior to and after supraglottoplasty[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2019, 119: 131-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.01.033

    [9]

    Olney DR, Greinwald JH Jr, Smith RJ, et al. Laryngomalacia and its treatment. [J]. Laryngoscope, 1999, 109(11): 1770-1775. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199911000-00009

    [10]

    Roger G, Denoyelle F, Triglia JM, et al. Severe laryngomalacia: surgical indications and results in 115 patients[J]. Laryngoscope, 1995, 105(10): 1111-1117. doi: 10.1288/00005537-199510000-00018

    [11]

    Carr MM, Ramadan J, Bauer E. Laryngomalacia in neonates versus older infants: HCUP-KID perspective[J]. Clin Pediatr, 2020, 59(7): 679-685. doi: 10.1177/0009922820908917

    [12]

    姜岚, 韩富根, 许莹, 等. 低温等离子在婴幼儿喉软化症声门上成形术中的应用[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2020, 34(9): 844-847, 852. https://lceh.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.09.017

    [13]

    浦诗磊, 李晓艳. 改良声门上成形术治疗喉软化症的疗效评价[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2019, 33(11): 1072-1075, 1080. https://lceh.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2019.11.016

    [14]

    El-Kholy NA, Hashish MI, ElSobki AA. Coagulation of the lateral surface of aryepiglottic folds as an alternative to aryepiglottic fold release in management of type 2 laryngomalacia[J]. Auris Nasus Larynx, 2020, 47(3): 443-449. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2019.10.004

    [15]

    刘燕, 魏萍, 寇巍, 等. 小儿重度喉软化症临床特点及手术疗效影响因素分析[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2022, 36(4): 258-264. https://lceh.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.04.004

    [16]

    Ng DK, Chan CH. A review of normal values of infant sleep polysomnography[J]. Pediatr Neonatol, 2013, 54(2): 82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2012.11.011

  • 加载中

(1)

(3)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  279
  • PDF下载数:  79
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2023-11-18
修回日期:  2024-01-08
刊出日期:  2024-11-03

目录