鼻膨胀体对鼻腔气流及艾蒿颗粒沉积的影响

张亚, 马瑞萍, 王玉升, 等. 鼻膨胀体对鼻腔气流及艾蒿颗粒沉积的影响[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2023, 37(7): 535-541. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.07.006
引用本文: 张亚, 马瑞萍, 王玉升, 等. 鼻膨胀体对鼻腔气流及艾蒿颗粒沉积的影响[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2023, 37(7): 535-541. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.07.006
ZHANG Ya, MA Ruiping, WANG Yusheng, et al. Effect of nasal swell body on nasal airflow and Artemisia pollen deposition[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2023, 37(7): 535-541. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.07.006
Citation: ZHANG Ya, MA Ruiping, WANG Yusheng, et al. Effect of nasal swell body on nasal airflow and Artemisia pollen deposition[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2023, 37(7): 535-541. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.07.006

鼻膨胀体对鼻腔气流及艾蒿颗粒沉积的影响

  • 基金项目:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No:82000960);陕西省重点研发计划项目(No:2020GXLH-Y-017);榆林市科技计划项目(No:CXY-2020-047)
详细信息

Effect of nasal swell body on nasal airflow and Artemisia pollen deposition

More Information
  • 目的 鼻膨胀体(nasal swell body,NSB)由鼻中隔软骨、骨和肿胀的软组织构成,在内镜检查和影像学检查中均可见。然而,目前其具体功能仍不十分清楚。根据解剖学和组织学证据,推测NSB在调节鼻气流和清洁过滤方面可能具有重要作用。本研究旨在探究NSB在生理状态下对鼻腔空气动力学和变应原颗粒沉积的影响。方法 对30名西北地区健康成年人志愿者进行鼻腔鼻窦CT扫描并重建鼻腔三维模型, 并在其基础上生成虚拟手术后的无NSB鼻腔模型。本研究采用计算流体力学数值模拟,对鼻腔内气流的分布、鼻阻力、加温加湿效率以及各解剖部位的花粉颗粒沉积率进行定量分析。此外,还使用3D打印技术制作了全透明分块鼻腔模型,用于鼻阻力测量和变应原颗粒沉积仿生实验。结果 ① 西北地区健康成人NSB双侧宽度(12.85±1.74)mm,长度为(28.30±1.92)mm;②移除NSB后,除了膨胀体平面局部气流流速减低外,其余截面流速无明显变化,整体鼻阻力无明显变化;③移除NSB后,鼻腔加温加湿功能无明显改变;④移除NSB后,艾蒿花粉在鼻中隔沉积减少,沉积率分别为(22.79±6.61)% vs(30.70±12.27)%;下气道沉积增加,沉积率分别为(24.12±6.59)% vs(17.00±5.57)%。结论 本研究首次探索了膨胀体对健康人群鼻腔内气流、加温加湿及变应原颗粒沉积的影响。研究结果发现健康鼻腔移除膨胀体:①鼻气流分布发生轻度改变,而鼻阻力则无明显变化;②鼻腔加温和加湿功能无明显变化;③鼻中隔过滤艾蒿花粉功能减弱,可导致下气道艾蒿花粉变应原沉积增加。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  有无NSB的鼻腔CT及三维模型

    图 2  鼻腔模型解剖分区(左侧鼻腔的外侧面及鼻中隔面)

    图 3  鼻腔截面划分及网格信息

    图 4  3D打印鼻腔模型花粉沉积实验图

    图 5  模型验证图

    图 6  NSB移除前后气流变化

    图 7  NSB移除前后温湿度变化

    图 8  NSB移除前后变应原颗粒沉积情况

    表 1  30名研究对象的解剖学特征 mm,X±S

    测量值 Costa等[17] 朱杭军等[3] Yu等[6]
    双侧宽度 12.85±1.74 12.40±1.90 10.30±1.27
    长度 28.30±1.92 28.10±3.60 31.35±5.18 25.4±5.30
    单侧宽度 6.45±1.08 5.13±1.30
    正中距鼻尖 38.31±4.23 43.90±4.10
    正中距鼻底 25.00±5.56 24.80±2.90
    正中距蝶窦面 38.52±3.49 39.00±4.60
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Arslan M, Muderris T, Muderris S. Radiological study of the intumescentia septi nasi anterior[J]. J Laryngol Otol, 2004, 118(3): 199-201. doi: 10.1258/002221504322927964

    [2]

    Meng X, Zhu G. Nasal Septal Swell Body: A Distinctive Structure in the Nasal Cavity[J]. Ear Nose Throat J, 2021, 21: 1455613211010093.

    [3]

    朱杭军, 张建东, 王玉海. 鼻中隔膨隆段的影像解剖测量[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2015, 22(9): 463-464. doi: 10.16066/j.1672-7002.2015.09.009

    [4]

    Hizli O, Kayabasi S, Ozkan D. Is Nasal Septal Body Size Associated With Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy and Allergic Rhinitis?[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2020, 31(3): 778-781. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006107

    [5]

    Wexler D, Braverman I, Amar M. Histology of the nasal septal swell body(septal turbinate)[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2006, 134(4): 596-600. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.10.058

    [6]

    Yu MS, Choi CH, Jung MS, et al. Correlation between septal body size and inferior turbinate hypertrophy on computerised tomography scans in fifty patients: A radiological analysis[J]. Clin Otolaryngol, 2018, 43(3): 952-955. doi: 10.1111/coa.13073

    [7]

    Demirci S, Ertan N, Tuzuner A, et al. Correlation Between the Septal Body and the Nasal Turbinates in Patients With Deviated Nasal Septum[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2016, 27(1): 166-169. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002335

    [8]

    马婷婷, 王朝霞, 贺宁, 等. 北京地区葎草花粉致敏的特征分析[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2022, 36(1): 41-44, 50. https://lceh.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.01.009

    [9]

    张亚, 张璐瑶, 黄芬, 等. 艾蒿花粉在中国西北地区人群鼻腔沉积规律的数值模拟研究[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2019, 54(10): 741-747. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2019.10.007

    [10]

    Siu J, Dong J, Inthavong K, et al. Quantification of airflow in the sinuses following functional endoscopic sinus surgery[J]. Rhinology, 2020, 58(3): 257-265.

    [11]

    Tretiakow D, Tesch K, Markiet K, et al. Maxillary sinus aeration analysis using computational fluid dynamics[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1): 10376. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14342-3

    [12]

    Ma R, Wang Y, Tian L, et al. Quantification of Artemisia pollen deposition in the paranasal sinuses following functional endoscopic sinus surgery[J]. Powder Technology, 2023, 419: 118318. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2023.118318

    [13]

    Tian L, Shang Y, Chen R, et al. Correlation of regional deposition dosage for inhaled nanoparticles in human and rat olfactory[J]. Part Fibre Toxicol, 2019, 16(1): 6. doi: 10.1186/s12989-019-0290-8

    [14]

    Zhang Y, Shang Y, Inthavong K, et al. Computational investigation of dust mite allergens in a realistic human nasal cavity[J]. Inhal Toxicol, 2019, 31(6): 224-235. doi: 10.1080/08958378.2019.1647315

    [15]

    Inthavong K, Shang Y, Del Gaudio JM, et al. Inhalation and deposition of spherical and pollen particles after middle turbinate resection in a human nasal cavity[J]. Respir Physiol Neurobiol, 2021, 294: 103769. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2021.103769

    [16]

    马瑞萍, 郑国玺, 鄂殿玉, 等. 基于3D打印透明鼻腔模型的鼻阻力变化规律研究[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2021, 35(12): 1101-1106. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2021.12.009 https://lceh.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2021.12.009

    [17]

    Costa DJ, Sanford T, Janney C, et al. Radiographic and anatomic characterization of the nasal septal swell body[J]. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2010, 136(11): 1107-1110. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.201

    [18]

    Kelly JT, Asgharian B, Kimbell JS, et al. Particle deposition in human nasal airway replicas manufactured by different methods. Part Ⅰ: Inertial regime particles[J]. Aerosol science and technology, 2004, 38(11): 1063-1071. doi: 10.1080/027868290883360

    [19]

    Shi H, Kleinstreuer C, Zhang Z. Modeling of inertial particle transport and deposition in human nasal cavities with wall roughness[J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2007, 38(4): 398-419. doi: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2007.02.002

    [20]

    Wotman M, Kacker A. Should otolaryngologists pay more attention to nasal swell bodies?[J]. Laryngoscope, 2015, 125(8): 1759-1760. doi: 10.1002/lary.25144

    [21]

    Setlur J, Goyal P. Relationship between septal body size and septal deviation[J]. Am J Rhinol Allergy, 2011, 25(6): 397-400. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3671

    [22]

    Patrascu E, Budu V, Musat G. Nasal swell body: a literature review[J]. Romanian Journal of Rhinology, 2020, 10(37): 19-23. doi: 10.2478/rjr-2020-0004

    [23]

    Delank KW, Keller R, Stoll W. Morphologie und rhinologische Bedeutung der Intumescentia septi nasi anterior[Morphology and rhinologic importance of intumescentia septi nasi anterior][J]. Laryngorhinootologie, 1993, 72(5): 242-246. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-997892

    [24]

    Hsu DW, Suh JD. Anatomy and Physiology of Nasal Obstruction[J]. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 2018, 51(5): 853-865. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2018.05.001

    [25]

    E Gelera J, Ojar D, Lim JH, et al. Radiographic Changes of the Nasal Septal Body Among Patients With Sinonasal Diseases[J]. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol, 2017, 10(4): 338-343. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2017.00080

    [26]

    Moss WJ, Faraji F, Jafari A, et al. A systematic review of the nasal septal turbinate: An overlooked surgical target[J]. Am J Otolaryngol, 2019, 40(6): 102188. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2019.03.003

    [27]

    Catalano P, Ashmead M, Carlson D. Radiofrequency ablation of septal swell body[J]. Ann Otolaryngol Rhinol, 2015, 2(11): 1069.

    [28]

    Farmer SE, Quine SM, Eccles R. Efficacy of inferior turbinate coblation for treatment of nasal obstruction[J]. J Laryngol Otol, 2009, 123(3): 309-314. doi: 10.1017/S0022215108002818

    [29]

    Chen X, Deng C, Mi J, et al. Barrier Protection Measures for the Management of Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis[J]. Am J Rhinol Allergy, 2020, 34(4): 564-572. doi: 10.1177/1945892420912370

    [30]

    Sirin Kose S, Atakul G, et al. Efficacy of allergen-blocker mechanical barrier gel on symptoms and quality of life in patients with allergic rhinitis[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2019, 276(3): 729-734. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-5251-6

    [31]

    Popov TA, Aberg N, Emberlin J, et al. Methyl-cellulose powder for prevention and management of nasal symptoms[J]. Expert Rev Respir Med, 2017, 11(11): 885-892. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2017.1375408

  • 加载中

(8)

(1)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  947
  • PDF下载数:  73
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2023-04-12
刊出日期:  2023-07-03

目录