甲状腺乳头状癌CN0期患者淋巴结转移危险因素分析

延常姣, 秦元, 凌瑞. 甲状腺乳头状癌CN0期患者淋巴结转移危险因素分析[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2024, 38(8): 709-714. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.08.007
引用本文: 延常姣, 秦元, 凌瑞. 甲状腺乳头状癌CN0期患者淋巴结转移危险因素分析[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2024, 38(8): 709-714. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.08.007
YAN Changjiao, QIN Yuan, LING Rui. Analysis of risk factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with CN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2024, 38(8): 709-714. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.08.007
Citation: YAN Changjiao, QIN Yuan, LING Rui. Analysis of risk factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with CN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2024, 38(8): 709-714. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.08.007

甲状腺乳头状癌CN0期患者淋巴结转移危险因素分析

  • 基金项目:
    国家自然科学基金(No:82303359)
详细信息

Analysis of risk factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with CN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma

More Information
  • 目的 探讨CN0期甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)患者淋巴结转移及多枚淋巴结转移的危险因素。方法 回顾性分析2013年1月-2022年12月空军军医大学西京医院行淋巴结清扫的3 099例CN0期PTC患者临床资料,单因素及多因素logistic回归分析淋巴结转移及多枚淋巴结转移的危险因素。结果 男性、年龄 < 55岁、多灶病灶、病灶大小>2 cm是CN0期PTC患者淋巴结转移的独立危险因素(P < 0.05),而合并糖尿病是淋巴结转移的独立保护因素(P < 0.05)。年龄 < 55岁、包膜侵犯、多灶病灶是淋巴结数目≥3枚的独立危险因素(P < 0.05)。结论 当CN0期PTC患者为男性、年龄 < 55岁、多灶病灶、病灶大小>2 cm时,要高度警惕淋巴结转移的可能性。
  • 加载中
  • 表 1  CN0期PTC患者淋巴结转移危险因素单因素分析 例(%)

    临床病理特征 pN0(n=1793) pN1(n=1306) χ2 P
    性别 70.735 < 0.001
      男 320(17.8) 402(30.8)
      女 1 473(82.2) 904(69.2)
    年龄 43.056 < 0.001
       < 55岁 1 426(79.5) 1155(88.4)
      ≥55岁 367(20.5) 151(11.6)
    有其他肿瘤史 32(1.8) 20(1.5) 0.294 0.672
    有家族肿瘤史 167(9.3) 108(8.3) 1.019 0.337
    有甲状腺癌家族史 28(1.6) 26(2.0) 0.813 0.405
    合并糖尿病 96(5.4) 41(3.1) 8.772 0.003
    合并高血压 216(12.0) 134(10.3) 2.407 0.135
    合并桥本甲状腺炎 269(15.0) 171(13.1) 2.261 0.144
    TSH 0.131 0.744
      正常 1 374(85.2) 1003(85.7)
      异常 238(14.8) 167(14.3)
    Tg 0.446 0.531
      阴性 1 133(74.4) 821(73.2)
      阳性 390(25.6) 300(26.8)
    TgAb 0.003 0.960
      阴性 1 279(82.0) 938(82.1)
      阳性 281(18.0) 205(17.9)
    包膜侵犯 163(9.1) 168(12.9) 11.274 0.001
    局部浸润 148(8.3) 155(11.9) 11.188 0.001
    病灶大小 33.497 < 0.001
      ≤2 cm 1 738(96.9) 1206(92.3)
      >2 cm 55(3.1) 100(7.7)
    病灶数目 16.433 < 0.001
      单灶 1 149(64.1) 743(56.9)
      多灶 644(35.9) 563(43.1)
    病灶分布 14.549 < 0.001
      一侧腺叶 1 409(59.8) 384(51.8)
      双侧腺叶 949(40.2) 357(48.2)
    BRAF V600E基因突变 1174(88.7) 857(89.6) 0.470 0.497
    TSH:共2 782例患者有术前TSH结果;Tg:共2 644例患者有术前Tg结果;TgAb:共2 703例患者有术前aTg结果;BRAF V600E:共2 279例患者进行基因检测。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  CN0期PTC患者淋巴结转移危险因素多因素分析

    因素 β OR 95%CI P
    上限 下限
    性别 -0.754 0.470 0.395 0.560 < 0.001
    年龄 -0.678 0.508 0.411 0.628 < 0.001
    合并糖尿病 -0.629 0.533 0.359 0.791 0.002
    包膜侵犯 0.251 1.285 0.889 1.857 0.182
    局部浸润 0.166 1.180 0.803 1.734 0.399
    病灶数目 0.275 1.317 1.067 1.625 0.010
    病灶分布 0.140 1.151 0.906 1.462 0.251
    病灶大小 0.879 2.409 1.699 3.415 < 0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  CN0期PTC患者淋巴结转移数目危险因素单因素分析 例(%)

    临床病理特征 pN1:1~2枚(n=839) pN1:3枚及以上(n=467) χ2 P
    性别 7.066 0.009
      男 237(28.2) 165(35.3)
      女 602(71.8) 302(64.7)
    年龄 3.941 0.058
       < 55岁 731(87.1) 424(90.8)
      ≥55岁 108(12.9) 43(9.2)
    有其他肿瘤史 12(1.4) 8(1.7) 0.159 0.815
    有家族肿瘤史 74(8.8) 34(7.3) 0.937 0.348
    有甲状腺癌家族史 15(1.8) 11(2.4) 76.062 < 0.001
    合并糖尿病 21(2.5) 20(4.3) 3.125 0.097
    合并高血压 89(10.6) 45(9.6) 0.308 0.635
    合并桥本甲状腺炎 102(12.2) 69(14.8) 1.807 0.199
    TSH 2.863 0.097
      正常 641(84.5) 362(88.1)
      异常 118(15.5) 49(11.9)
    Tg 0.931 0.358
      阴性 540(74.2) 281(71.5)
      阳性 188(25.8) 112(28.5)
    TgAb 2.277 0.147
      阴性 615(83.3) 323(79.8)
      阳性 123(16.7) 82(20.2)
    包膜侵犯 96(11.4) 72(15.4) 4.230 0.047
    局部浸润 95(11.3) 60(12.8) 0.667 0.423
    病灶大小 4.027 0.051
      ≤2 cm 784(93.4) 422(90.4)
      >2 cm 55(6.6) 45(9.6)
    病灶数目 8.280 0.004
      单灶 502(59.8) 241(51.6)
      多灶 337(40.2) 226(48.4)
    病灶分布 4.483 0.038
      一侧腺叶 626(74.6) 323(69.2)
      双侧腺叶 213(25.4) 144(30.8)
    BRAF V600E基因突变* 571(89.2) 286(90.5) 0.378 0.574
    TSH:共1 170例患者有术前TSH结果;Tg:共1 121例患者有术前Tg结果;TgAb:共1 143例患者有术前aTg结果;BRAF V600E:共956例患者进行基因检测。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  CN0期PTC患者淋巴结转移数目危险因素多因素分析

    因素 β OR 95%CI P
    上限 下限
    性别 -0.245 0.783 0.601 1.020 0.069
    年龄 -0.561 0.571 0.375 0.870 0.009
    甲状腺癌家族史 0.321 1.379 0.575 3.308 0.472
    合并糖尿病 0.495 1.640 0.832 3.235 0.153
    TSH -0.305 0.737 0.512 1.059 0.099
    包膜侵犯 0.369 1.446 1.008 2.074 0.045
    病灶数目 0.397 1.487 1.054 2.098 0.024
    病灶分布 -0.072 0.930 0.637 1.360 0.709
    病灶大小 0.316 1.371 0.878 2.142 0.165
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, et al. Cancer statistics, 2023[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2023, 73(1): 17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763

    [2]

    Zhang Q, Li J, Shen H, et al. Screening and validation of lymph node metastasis risk-factor genes in papillary thyroid carcinoma[J]. Front Endocrinol(Lausanne), 2022, 13: 991906. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.991906

    [3]

    辛运超, 孙晓冉, 尚小领, 等. 甲状腺乳头状癌德尔法淋巴结检出率与转移率及转移的危险因素分析[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2024, 38(2): 150-154, 159. https://lceh.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.02.013

    [4]

    Gordon AJ, Dublin JC, Patel E, et al. American Thyroid Association Guidelines and National Trends in Management of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma[J]. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2022, 148(12): 1156-1163. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2022.3360

    [5]

    Li Y, Lao L. Comparison of prophylactic ipsilateral and bilateral central lymph node dissection in papillary thyroid carcinoma: a meta-analysis[J]. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 2023, 89(6): 101318. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2023.101318

    [6]

    刘颂玉, 吴芳芳, 徐闪闪. 甲状腺癌超声特征与颈部淋巴结转移的相关性[J]. 影像科学与光化学, 2020, 38(4): 647-651. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GKGH202004010.htm

    [7]

    张洁, 冯艳红, 何秀丽, 等. 常规超声特征及BRAFV600E基因突变与甲状腺乳头状癌中央区淋巴结转移的相关性[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2022, 36(3): 184-188. https://lceh.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.03.006

    [8]

    Eun NL, Son EJ, Kim JA, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic performances of ultrasonography, CT and fine needle aspiration cytology for the prediction of lymph node metastasis in patients with lymph node dissection of papillary thyroid carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study[J]. Int J Surg, 2018, 51: 145-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.12.036

    [9]

    Song Y, Xu G, Wang T, et al. Indications of Superselective Neck Dissection in Patients With Lateral Node Metastasis of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2022, 166(5): 832-839. doi: 10.1177/01945998211038318

    [10]

    Gao X, Luo W, He L, et al. Predictors and a Prediction Model for Central Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma(cN0)[J]. Front Endocrinol(Lausanne), 2022, 12: 789310. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.789310

    [11]

    Li J, Sun P, Huang T, et al. Preoperative prediction of central lymph node metastasis in cN0T1/T2 papillary thyroid carcinoma: A nomogram based on clinical and ultrasound characteristics[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2022, 48(6): 1272-1279. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.04.001

    [12]

    Lebbink CA, Links TP, Czarniecka A, et al. 2022 European Thyroid Association Guidelines for the management of pediatric thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid carcinoma[J]. Eur Thyroid J, 2022, 11(6): e220146.

    [13]

    Ma Q, Chen Z, Fang Y, et al. Development and validation of survival nomograms for patients with differentiated thyroid cancer with distant metastases: a SEER Program-based study[J]. J Endocrinol Invest, 2024, 47(1): 115-129.

    [14]

    Zhao H, Li H. Meta-analysis of ultrasound for cervical lymph nodes in papillary thyroid cancer: Diagnosis of central and lateral compartment nodal metastases[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2019, 112: 14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.01.006

    [15]

    Mulla MG, Knoefel WT, Gilbert J, et al. Lateral cervical lymph node metastases in papillary thyroid cancer: a systematic review of imaging-guided and prophylactic removal of the lateral compartment[J]. Clin Endocrinol(Oxf), 2012, 77(1): 126-131. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2012.04336.x

    [16]

    Wang Y, Deng C, Shu X, et al. Risk Factors and a Prediction Model of Lateral Lymph Node Metastasis in CN0 Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Patients With 1-2 Central Lymph Node Metastases[J]. Front Endocrinol(Lausanne), 2021, 12: 716728. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.716728

    [17]

    Parvathareddy SK, Siraj AK, Ahmed SO, et al. Risk Factors for Central Lymph Node Metastases and Benefit of Prophylactic Central Lymph Node Dissection in Middle Eastern Patients With cN0 Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma[J]. Front Oncol, 2022, 11: 819824. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.819824

    [18]

    Yan B, Hou Y, Chen D, et al. Risk factors for contralateral central lymph node metastasis in unilateral cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma: A meta-analysis[J]. Int J Surg, 2018, 59: 90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.09.004

    [19]

    Shu X, Tang L, Hu D, et al. Prediction Model of Pathologic Central Lymph Node Negativity in cN0 Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 11: 727984. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.727984

    [20]

    Sun W, Lan X, Zhang H, et al. Risk Factors for Central Lymph Node Metastasis in CN0 Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(10): e0139021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139021

    [21]

    Ma B, Wang Y, Yang S, et al. Predictive factors for central lymph node metastasis in patients with cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Surg, 2016, 28: 153-161. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.02.093

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  389
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2023-11-23
刊出日期:  2024-08-03

返回顶部

目录