Characteristics of nystagmus and its therapeutic effect in the reduction of posterior semicircular canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo
-
摘要: 目的 通过观察后半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕(PC-BPPV)患者行Epley复位过程中不同位置出现的眼震形式，比较其首次复位效果，进一步总结分析可能引起复位失败的原因及不同眼震形式对患者预后的判断。方法 回顾性分析191例PC-BPPV患者的临床资料，其中95例复位过程中仅出现正向眼震者设为A组，69例复位过程中均未出现眼震者设为B组，27例复位过程中出现反向眼震者设为C组。通过G-Force眩晕诊疗仪确诊并模拟Epley法复位，比较复位过程中眼震形式及首次复位效果。结果 A组首次复位效果优于C组(P < 0.05)；B组复位效果优于C组(P < 0.05)；A组与B组复位效果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 PC-BPPV复位过程出现的眼震形式对首次复位效果的评估及成功复位有一定的指导意义。PC-BPPV复位过程出现反向眼震，预示复位效果较差。Abstract: Objective By observing the nystagmus forms at different positions during Epley reduction in patients with posterior semicircular canal benign parochial positional vertigo(PC-BPPV), to compare the effects of the first reduction, and to further summarize the possible causes of reduction failure and the prognosis of patients with different nystagmus forms.Methods A retrospective analysis of 191 PC-BPPV patients diagnosed with PC-BPPV showed that 95 cases had positive nystagmus during the reduction process(group A), 69 cases had no nystagmus (group B), and 27 cases had reverse nystagmus (group C). All the patients were diagnosed by G-Force BPPV and were treated through simulative Epley CRP. The form of nystagmus and the effect of the first reduction were compared.Results The first reduction effect of group A was better than that of group C(P < 0.05). The reduction effect of group B was better than that of group C(P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the reduction effect between group A and group B(P>0.05).Conclusion The form of nystagmus in the reduction process of PC-BPPV has a certain guiding significance for the evaluation of the first reduction effect and the successful reduction. The reverse nystagmus during the reduction process indicates a poor reduction effect.
-
Key words:
- vertigo /
- posterior semicircular canal /
- nystagmus
-
-
[1] 刘日钊, 郑锦泉, 董洪松, 等. 健侧Dix-Hallpike及Roll-test诱发眼震的单侧后半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕复位疗效分析[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2020, 34(11): 1027-1029. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCEH202011017.htm
[2] 苏丽葵, 蒋智, 李园园, 等. 眼震视图检测仪下耳石复位的效果研究[J]. 智慧健康, 2020, 6(25): 37-39. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHJK202025014.htm
[3] 赵东, 姜子刚. 特发性后半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕患者复位过程中解脱眼震的特点及临床意义研究[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2018, 32(15): 1134-1138. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCEH201815003.htm
[4] Asadi H, Mohamed S, Lim CP, et al. A review on otolith models in human perception[J]. Behav Brain Res, 2016, 309: 67-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.03.043
[5] 王永坡, 李强, 姜亚妮, 等. 仿生耳石器的冲击与振动传感特性研究[J]. 传感技术学报, 2020, 33(5): 655-660. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1699.2020.05.005
[6] 李文康, 王永坡, 徐强, 等. 一种仿生壶腹嵴的振动传感特性研究[J]. 传感技术学报, 2020, 33(1): 40-44. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CGJS202001008.htm
[7] Baloh RW, Honrubia V. Clinical neurophysiology of the vestibular system[M]. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001: 41-42.
[8] 周益飞, 王照亮, 郑慧珍, 等. 改良Dix-Hallpike试验在后半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕诊断中的应用[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2019, 33(6): 512-514. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCEH201906011.htm
[9] House MG, Honrubia V. Theoretical models for the mechanisms of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo[J]. Audiol Neurootol, 2003, 8(2): 91-99. doi: 10.1159/000068998
[10] 龚清平, 张扬, 李远军, 等. 后半规管管石症和嵴顶结石症复位眼震分析[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2018, 32(4): 260-263. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCEH201804005.htm
[11] 邱冰, 尹晓新. 老年人良性阵发性位置性眩晕的研究进展[J]. 中国实用神经疾病杂志, 2021, 24(2): 166-171. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNSJ202102013.htm
[12] 吴照红, 周雪芳. 不同复位手法治疗后半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕疗效及原因分析[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2018, 25(11): 585-587. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-EBYT201811004.htm
[13] 王建洪, 胡珍, 高思敏, 等. 仪器辅助复位结合心理辅导治疗良性阵发性位置性眩晕[J]. 中国中西医结合耳鼻咽喉科杂志, 2017, 25(5): 345-348. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYJH201705009.htm
[14] 张鹏飞, 高冠彩, 赵丹, 等. BPPV诊疗系统复位与手法复位治疗良性阵发性位置性眩晕疗效的Meta分析[J]. 精准医学杂志, 2019, 34(4): 341-344, 349. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SPAN201904016.htm
[15] Lou Y, Cai M, Xu L, et al. Efficacy of BPPV diagnosis and treatment system for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo[J]. Am J Otolaryngol, 2020, 41(3): 102412. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102412
[16] 姜宁, 贾媛媛, 马力学. 单侧后半规管良性发作性位置性眩晕试验诱发的眼震与耳石复位法疗效及复发的相关性分析[J]. 中国保健营养, 2019, 29(35): 290.
[17] 李文志, 陈金莲. 不同病程后半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕耳石复位效果分析[J]. 福建医药杂志, 2019, 41(3): 99-101. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FJYY201903040.htm
-
计量
- 文章访问数: 640
- PDF下载数: 188
- 施引文献: 0
下载: