急性前庭神经炎视频头脉冲抑制试验参数与DHI评分改变的相关性

钱村慧, 时晨, 陈奕虹, 等. 急性前庭神经炎视频头脉冲抑制试验参数与DHI评分改变的相关性[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2024, 38(7): 589-592. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.07.006
引用本文: 钱村慧, 时晨, 陈奕虹, 等. 急性前庭神经炎视频头脉冲抑制试验参数与DHI评分改变的相关性[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2024, 38(7): 589-592. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.07.006
QIAN Cunhui, SHI Chen, CHEN Yihong, et al. Correlation between parameters of suppression head impulse paradigm and changesin DHI score in acute vestibular neuritis[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2024, 38(7): 589-592. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.07.006
Citation: QIAN Cunhui, SHI Chen, CHEN Yihong, et al. Correlation between parameters of suppression head impulse paradigm and changesin DHI score in acute vestibular neuritis[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2024, 38(7): 589-592. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.07.006

急性前庭神经炎视频头脉冲抑制试验参数与DHI评分改变的相关性

详细信息

Correlation between parameters of suppression head impulse paradigm and changesin DHI score in acute vestibular neuritis

More Information
  • 目的 探讨视频头脉冲抑制试验(suppression head impulse paradigm,SHIMP)的参数与眩晕障碍量表(dizziness handicap inventory,DHI)评分改变的相关性,以期通过SHIMP的相关参数来评估急性前庭神经炎的眩晕程度及预后。方法 选取急性前庭神经炎患者33例,行DHI量表评估、vHIT和SHIMP检查,病程达2周且不伴自发性眼震时再次行DHI量表评估。以第二次DHI评分的下降幅度,作为疗效指标(efficacy index,EI)。将所有患者按照疗效分为显效、有效和无效3组。比较3组患者SHIMP的前庭眼反射增益值及反代偿扫视波出现率之间的差异。结果 显效组13例,有效组11例,无效组9例。①在各组水平半规管增益均值比较中,显效组增益均值为(0.50±0.11);有效组增益均值为(0.44±0.12);无效组增益均值为(0.34±0.08)。显效组与无效组增益均值差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01)。水平半规管增益值与EI呈正相关(r=0.538 5,P < 0.01);②在各组水平半规管反代偿扫视波出现率均值比较中,显效组反代偿扫视波出现率均值为(51.23±19.59);有效组反代偿扫视波出现率均值为(33.64±17.68);无效组反代偿扫视波出现率均值为(13.78±11.81)。各组间两两比较均差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。水平半规管反代偿扫视波出现率与EI呈正相关(r=0.658 2,P < 0.01)。结论 急性前庭神经炎患者SHIMP检查中的增益值以及反代偿扫视波出现率与DHI评分下降幅度密切相关。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  正常受试者及急性VN患者检测结果

    图 2  水平管组间VOR增益及组间反代偿性扫视波出现率的方差分析

    图 3  水平管VOR增益及反代偿扫视波出现率与EI的相关性分析

  • [1]

    Tokle G, Mørkved S, Bråthen G, et al. Efficacy of vestibular rehabilitation following acute vestibular neuritis: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2020, 41(1): 78-85. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002443

    [2]

    Le TN, Westerberg BD, Lea J. Vestibular neuritis: recent advances in etiology, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment[J]. Adv Otorhinolaryngol, 2019, 82: 87-92.

    [3]

    MacDougall HG, McGarvie LA, Halmagyi GM, et al. A new saccadic indicator of peripheral vestibular function based on the video head impulse test[J]. Neurology, 2016, 87(4): 410-418. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002827

    [4]

    Casani AP, Canelli R, Lazzerini F, et al. Prognosis after acute unilateral vestibulopathy: Usefulness of the suppression head impulse paradigm(SHIMP)[J]. J Vestib Res, 2021, 31(6): 531-540. doi: 10.3233/VES-210038

    [5]

    Şahin M, Köko lu K, Gülmez E. Mean platelet volume, neutrophil-and platelet to lymphocyte ratios are elevated in vestibular neuritis[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2019, 67: 134-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.05.062

    [6]

    Kim TS, Lim HW, Yang CJ, et al. Changes of video head impulse test results in lateral semicircular canal plane by different peak head velocities in patients with vestibular neuritis[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2018, 138(9): 785-789. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2018.1481523

    [7]

    Park JS, Lee JY, Nam W, et al. Comparing the suppression head impulse paradigm and the head impulse paradigm in vestibular neuritis[J]. and, 2020, 41(1): e76-e82.

    [8]

    Manzari L, Tramontano M. Suppression Head Impulse Paradigm(SHIMP)in evaluating the vestibulo-saccadic interaction in patients with vestibular neuritis[J]. Eur Arch Oto Rhino Laryngol, 2020, 277(11): 3205-3212. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-06085-6

    [9]

    李俊, 张云美, 时晨, 等. 前庭神经炎患者视频头脉冲试验与DHI评分的相关性分析[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2022, 36(11): 854-858. https://lceh.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.11.009

    [10]

    中国医师协会神经内科分会眩晕专业委员会, 中国卒中学会卒中与眩晕分会. 前庭神经炎诊治多学科专家共识[J]. 中华老年医学杂志, 2020, 39(9): 985-994.

    [11]

    丁雷, 刘畅, 王嘉玺, 等. 眩晕残障程度评定量表(中文版)的评价[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2013, 11(2): 228-230. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHER201302016.htm

    [12]

    Whitney SL, Wrisley DM, Brown KE, et al. Is perception of handicap related to functional performance in persons with vestibular dysfunction?[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2004, 25(2): 139-143. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200403000-00010

    [13]

    Yang TH, Xirasagar S, Cheng YF, et al. Peripheral Vestibular Disorders: Nationwide Evidence From Taiwan[J]. Laryngoscope, 2021, 131(3): 639-643. doi: 10.1002/lary.28877

    [14]

    Roehm PC, Camarena V, Nayak S, et al. Cultured vestibular ganglion neurons demonstrate latent HSV1 reactivation[J]. Laryngoscope, 2011, 121(10): 2268-2275. doi: 10.1002/lary.22035

    [15]

    Strupp M, Brandt T. Peripheral vestibular disorders[J]. Curr Opin Neurol, 2013, 26(1): 81-89. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e32835c5fd4

    [16]

    Arbusow V, Derfuss T, Held K, et al. Latency of herpes simplex virus type-1 in human geniculate and vestibular Ganglia is associated with infiltration of CD8+T cells[J]. J Med Virol, 2010, 82(11): 1917-1920. doi: 10.1002/jmv.21904

    [17]

    Pollak L, Book M, Smetana Z, et al. Herpes simplex virus type 1 in saliva of patients with vestibular neuronitis: a preliminary study[J]. Neurologist, 2011, 17(6): 330-332. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e318235a0e7

    [18]

    庄建华. 前庭神经炎不同时期的临床特征和处理策略[J]. 中华内科杂志, 2023, 62(7): 743-747.

    [19]

    Fetter M. Vestibulo-ocular reflex[J]. Dev Ophthalmol, 2007, 40: 35-51. doi: 10.1159/000100348

    [20]

    陈飞云, 张玉忠, 吴彩芹, 等. 头脉冲抑制试验在单侧前庭神经炎患者中的应用价值[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2018, 32(18): 1374-1377. https://lceh.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2018.18.003

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  226
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2023-10-31
修回日期:  2024-01-23
刊出日期:  2024-07-03

返回顶部

目录