鼻内镜下复发性鼻咽癌手术治疗的临床研究

何引, 殷海, 吴家森, 等. 鼻内镜下复发性鼻咽癌手术治疗的临床研究[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2023, 37(10): 771-777. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.10.002
引用本文: 何引, 殷海, 吴家森, 等. 鼻内镜下复发性鼻咽癌手术治疗的临床研究[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2023, 37(10): 771-777. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.10.002
HE Yin, YIN Hai, WU Jiasen, et al. Clinical study of endoscopic surgery for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2023, 37(10): 771-777. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.10.002
Citation: HE Yin, YIN Hai, WU Jiasen, et al. Clinical study of endoscopic surgery for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2023, 37(10): 771-777. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.10.002

鼻内镜下复发性鼻咽癌手术治疗的临床研究

  • 基金项目:
    贵港市科学研究与技术开发项目(No:贵科攻1908026)
详细信息

Clinical study of endoscopic surgery for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma

More Information
  • 目的 探讨复发性鼻咽癌分别采用手术治疗+化疗及放疗+化疗的临床效果及并发症的对比,从而比较两种不同治疗方法的安全性及治疗效果。方法 回顾性分析2016年1月-2020年10月我院收治的40例鼻咽癌放化疗后复发的患者,其中26例(观察组)鼻内镜下切除复发的肿瘤的患者,术中冷冻切缘均为阴性,同期采用带蒂的鼻中隔黏膜瓣、颞肌瓣以及颏下瓣进行修复,rT3及rT4患者术后3~5周继续化疗。以14例采用二次放疗+化疗的方案的患者作为对照组。术后观察患者的并发症及生存率。结果 观察组26例患者中19例行鼻中隔黏膜瓣修复,5例行颞肌瓣修复,2例行颏下瓣修复,2例鼻中隔黏膜瓣出现坏死及脑脊液鼻漏,二期手术用颞肌瓣进行二次修复,8例需要行颈部淋巴结清扫术。患者术后恢复良好,rT3及rT4患者根据伤口情况术后3~5周进行化疗。比较2组并发症发生率及1~3年的生存率,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论 复发性鼻咽癌患者可以通过鼻内镜下手术治疗切除肿物,并且采用带蒂的鼻中隔黏膜瓣、颞肌瓣以及颏下瓣进行颅底重建,可以有效地预防颈内动脉破裂大出血等重大并发症,提高患者生存率及生活质量。为复发性鼻咽癌患者提供了一种安全、有效的治疗方式。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  复发性鼻咽癌患者鼻中隔黏膜瓣修复情况

    图 2  复发性鼻咽癌患者颞肌瓣修复情况

    图 3  鼻咽癌复发患者使用颏下瓣修复情况

    表 1  观察组与对照组患者一般资料比较

    基本资料 观察组 对照组 χ2t P
    性别(男/女) 14/12 8/6 0.040 0.842
    年龄/岁 58.0±7.2 60.0±6.7 0.858 0.400
    首次放疗时间/月 42.0±6.8 41.0±5.6 0.470 0.641
    病理/例 0.101 0.750
      非角化性未分化型癌 18 9
      鳞状细胞癌 8 5
    T分期/例 0.586 0.899
      rT1期 3 2
      rT2期 7 3
      rT3期 14 7
      rT4期 2 2
    N分期/例 0.064 0.969
      rN0期 21 11
      rN1期 3 2
      rN2期 2 1
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  2组患者并发症比较 

    并发症 观察组 对照组 χ2或校正χ2 P
    张口受限 2 8 9.38 < 0.01
    吞咽困难 2 9 11.92 < 0.01
    中重度贫血 3 5 2.38 0.123
    颞叶坏死 0 4 5.38 0.020
    颅底坏死或脑脊液漏 2 6 5.01 0.025
    头颈部疼痛 2 10 14.70 < 0.01
    咽干 1 12 24.19 < 0.01
    鼻咽大出血 0 4 5.39 0.02
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  2组患者生存率比较 例(%)

    组别 例数 1年 2年 3年
    观察组 26 24(92.31) 22(84.61) 17(65.39)
    对照组 14 9(64.29) 6(42.86) 3(21.42)
    χ2或校正χ2 4.95 5.70 7.03
    P 0.026 0.017 <0.01
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Yeh SA, Hwang TZ, Wang CC, et al. Outcomes of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy[J]. J Radiat Res, 2021, 62(3): 438-447. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrab008

    [2]

    Huang RD, Sun Z, Wang XH, et al. Development of a Comorbidity-Based Nomogram to Predict Survival After Salvage Reirradiation of Locally Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma in the Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Era[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 10: 625184. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.625184

    [3]

    Wei Z, Zhang Z, Luo J, et al. Induction chemotherapy plus IMRT alone versus induction chemotherapy plus IMRT-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study[J]. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 2019, 145(7): 1857-1864. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-02925-z

    [4]

    Dai Q, Shi YX, Zhang HK, et al. Salvage endoscopic surgery for skull base osteoradionecrosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: A prospective, observational, single-arm clinical study[J]. Rhinology, 2023, 61(1): 61-70.

    [5]

    Liao JF, Zhang Q, Du XJ, et al. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly docetaxel versus cisplatin in the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis[J]. Cancer Commun(Lond), 2019, 39(1): 40.

    [6]

    Fatima K, Andleeb A, Sofi MA, et al. Clinical outcome of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus two-dimensional conventional radiotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Comparative study at SKIMS Tertiary Care Institute[J]. J Cancer Res Ther, 2022, 18(1): 133-139. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_169_21

    [7]

    Kong F, Zhou J, Du C, et al. Long-term survival and late complications of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. BMC Cancer, 2018, 18(1): 1139.

    [8]

    Li W, Zhang Q, Chen F, et al. Endoscopic surgery is superior to intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of advanced recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2023, 13(2): 140-150.

    [9]

    Liu YP, Wen YH, Tang J, et al. Endoscopic surgery compared with intensity-modulated radiotherapy in resectable locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2021, 22(3): 381-390.

    [10]

    张焕康, 孙希才, 于华鹏, 等. 颞肌皮瓣在晚期复发性鼻咽癌挽救性鼻咽切除术中的应用[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2022, 57(11): 1282-1287.

    [11]

    张焕康, 张明, 蒋晓文, 等. 颏下瓣在鼻咽癌手术修复中的应用[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2022, 36(7): 506-509, 514. https://lceh.whuhzzs.com/article/doi/10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.07.005

    [12]

    You R, Zou X, Hua YJ, et al. Salvage endoscopic nasopharyngectomy is superior to intensity-modulated radiation therapy for local recurrence of selected T1-T3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma-A case-matched comparison[J]. Radiother Oncol, 2015, 115(3): 399-406.

    [13]

    Peng Z, Wang Y, Wang Y, et al. Comparing the Effectiveness of Endoscopic Surgeries With Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Recurrent rT3 and rT4 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis[J]. Front Oncol, 2021, 26(11): 703954.

  • 加载中

(3)

(3)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  549
  • PDF下载数:  105
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2023-05-06
刊出日期:  2023-10-03

目录