新生儿小下颌畸形伴喉软化的气道管理及治疗

汪景, 徐梦柔, 金蕾, 等. 新生儿小下颌畸形伴喉软化的气道管理及治疗[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2023, 37(8): 622-625. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.08.004
引用本文: 汪景, 徐梦柔, 金蕾, 等. 新生儿小下颌畸形伴喉软化的气道管理及治疗[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2023, 37(8): 622-625. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.08.004
WANG Jing, XU Mengrou, JIN Lei, et al. The airway management and treatment of newborns with micrognathia and laryngomalacia[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2023, 37(8): 622-625. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.08.004
Citation: WANG Jing, XU Mengrou, JIN Lei, et al. The airway management and treatment of newborns with micrognathia and laryngomalacia[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2023, 37(8): 622-625. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.08.004

新生儿小下颌畸形伴喉软化的气道管理及治疗

  • 基金项目:
    国家自然科学基金(No:82272270);上海市自然科学基金(No:22ZR1451700)
详细信息

The airway management and treatment of newborns with micrognathia and laryngomalacia

More Information
  • 目的 探讨小下颌畸形伴喉软化新生儿的围手术期气道管理及治疗。方法 2022年1—12月共纳入6例小下颌畸形伴喉软化新生儿。术前喉镜检查发现合并喉软化。小下颌畸形确诊为皮罗综合征。术前患儿均存在Ⅱ度以上的喉梗阻表现,需予以吸氧或无创呼吸机辅助通气治疗。所有患儿均同期行喉软化手术和双侧下颌骨牵引成骨术,术中用低温等离子射频刀消融短缩的杓会厌皱襞,术后气管插管3~5 d。术前、术后3个月行多导睡眠呼吸监测评估(PSG)及气道CT检查。结果 6例患儿中4例术前需要吸氧,2例需无创呼吸机辅助通气治疗。手术平均年龄为40 d,术中均未损伤下牙槽神经血管束,术后均未出现口角歪斜等下颌缘支损伤表现。喉软化表现为混合型:Ⅱ型+Ⅲ型;最大下颌骨牵引延长距离20 mm,最小12 mm,平均16 mm;后气道间隙由术前平均3.5 mm增加到术后9.5 mm;AHI由平均5.65降至0.85,最低血氧饱和度由平均78%增加至95%。术后患儿均成功拔除气管插管,缺氧、喂养困难等喉梗阻症状均消失。结论 小下颌畸形伴喉软化新生儿存在多平面的气道梗阻,早期同时行喉软化术和下颌骨牵引成骨术安全可行,能有效解决患儿缺氧、喂养困难等喉梗阻症状,同时显著改善小下颌的外观。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  下颌骨牵引成骨术手术过程

    图 2  下颌骨牵引成骨术前和术后比较

    图 3  新生儿小下颌伴喉软化的气道管理及治疗策略图

    表 1  病例资料特征

    项目 例1 例2 例3 例4 例5 例6 均值
    手术时年龄/d 35 45 42 40 41 37 40
    性别 /
    下颌牵引距离/mm 16 14 12 16 18 20 16
    喉软化分型 Ⅱ+Ⅲ Ⅱ+Ⅲ /
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  治疗效果

    序号 后气道间隙/mm 最低血氧饱和度/% AHI
    术前 术后 术前 术后 术前 术后
    1 3.5 9.6 79 95 5.6 0.6
    2 4.2 11.0 83 98 4.5 0.6
    3 4.3 10.6 86 98 3.8 0.4
    4 3.5 9.0 74 95 6.8 0.8
    5 3.0 8.8 77 92 7.5 1.2
    6 2.5 8.0 69 92 - 1.5
    均值 3.5 9.5 78 95 5.65 0.85
    P < 0.01 < 0.01 < 0.01
    “—”为无法完成检测。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Hsieh ST, Woo AS. Pierre Robin Sequence[J]. Clin Plast Surg, 2019, 46(2): 249-259. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2018.11.010

    [2]

    Flores RL, Tholpady SS, Sati S, et al. The surgical correction of Pierre Robin sequence: mandibular distraction osteogenesis versus tongue-lip adhesion[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2014, 133(6): 1433-1439. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000225

    [3]

    Flores RL, Greathouse ST, Costa M, et al. Defining failure and its predictors in mandibular distraction for Robin sequence[J]. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2015, 43(8): 1614-1619. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.06.039

    [4]

    Hammoudeh JA, Fahradyan A, Brady C, et al. Predictors of Failure in Infant Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2018, 76(9): 1955-1965. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.03.008

    [5]

    Giudice A, Barone S, Belhous K, et al. Pierre Robin sequence: A comprehensive narrative review of the literature over time[J]. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2018, 119(5): 419-428. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2018.05.002

    [6]

    刘晓君, 李晓艳. 喉软化症的发病机制及相关疾病研究进展[J]. 国际耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2019, 43(5): 260-263.

    [7]

    浦诗磊, 李晓艳. 改良声门上成形术治疗喉软化症的疗效评价[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2019, 33(11): 1072-1075, 1080. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCEH201911017.htm

    [8]

    Carter J, Rahbar R, Brigger M, et al. International Pediatric ORL Group(IPOG)laryngomalacia consensus recommendations[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2016, 86: 256-261. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.04.007

    [9]

    Ramprasad VH, Ryan MA, Farjat AE, et al. Practice patterns in supraglottoplasty and perioperative care[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2016, 86: 118-123. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.04.039

    [10]

    中国妇幼保健学会微创分会儿童耳鼻咽喉学组. 儿童喉软化症诊断与治疗临床实践指南[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2020, 34(11): 961-965. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCEH202011001.htm

    [11]

    Viezel-Mathieu A, Safran T, Gilardino MS. A Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Tongue Lip Adhesion in Improving Airway Obstruction in Children With Pierre Robin Sequence[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2016, 27(6): 1453-1456. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002721

    [12]

    Susarla SM, Mundinger GS, Chang CC, et al: Gastrostomy Placement Rates in Infants with Pierre Robin Sequence: A Comparison of Tongue-Lip Adhesion and Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2017, 139(1): 149-154. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002865

    [13]

    Morrison KA, Collares MV, Flores RL. Robin Sequence: Neonatal Mandibular Distraction[J]. Clin Plast Surg, 2021, 48(3): 363-373. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2021.03.005

    [14]

    Zhang RS, Hoppe IC, Taylor JA, et al. Surgical Management and Outcomes of Pierre Robin Sequence: A Comparison of Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis and Tongue-Lip Adhesion[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2018, 142(2): 480-509. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004581

    [15]

    Diep GK, Eisemann BS, Flores RL. Neonatal Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis in Infants With Pierre Robin Sequence[J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2020, 31(4): 1137-1141. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006343

    [16]

    Xu Y, Tan Y, Zhang N, et al. A Standardized Extubation Schedule Reduces Respiratory Events After Extubation Following Mandibular Distraction in Infants[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2021, 79(11): 2257-2266. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.05.002

    [17]

    Payne SH, Brady CM, Mercury OA, et al. Mandibular Distraction in Neonatal Pierre Robin Sequence: Is Immediate Extubation Both Feasible and Safe?[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2022, 149(6): 1155e-1164e.

    [18]

    Zhang RS, Lin LO, Hoppe IC, et al. Risk Factors for Perioperative Respiratory Failure following Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis for Micrognathia: A Retrospective Cohort Study[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2019, 143(6): 1725-1736.

  • 加载中

(3)

(2)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  724
  • PDF下载数:  264
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2023-05-26
刊出日期:  2023-08-03

目录