单侧急性耳鸣患者耳蜗电生理学研究

吴文丽, 丁雷, 高铭媛, 等. 单侧急性耳鸣患者耳蜗电生理学研究[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2022, 36(5): 357-361. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.05.007
引用本文: 吴文丽, 丁雷, 高铭媛, 等. 单侧急性耳鸣患者耳蜗电生理学研究[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2022, 36(5): 357-361. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.05.007
WU Wenli, DING Lei, GAO Mingyuan, et al. Electrophysiological study of the cochlea in patients with unilateral acute tinnitus[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2022, 36(5): 357-361. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.05.007
Citation: WU Wenli, DING Lei, GAO Mingyuan, et al. Electrophysiological study of the cochlea in patients with unilateral acute tinnitus[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2022, 36(5): 357-361. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.05.007

单侧急性耳鸣患者耳蜗电生理学研究

详细信息

Electrophysiological study of the cochlea in patients with unilateral acute tinnitus

More Information
  • 目的 分析单侧急性耳鸣患者纯音测听(PTA)、扩展高频测听(EHFA)、畸变产物耳声发射(DPOAE)、听性脑干反应(ABR)、耳蜗电图(ECochG)的客观检测结果,探讨其对隐性听力损失的临床应用价值。方法 对33例以单侧急性耳鸣为主诉的患者进行PTA、DPOAE、ABR、ECochG检测,对DPOAE各频率检出率及反应幅值、ABR各波潜伏期及波间期、ECochG中-SP/AP的结果进行分析。结果 ① 双耳PTA在0.25~8 kHz各频率阈值结果均在正常范围内(P>0.05),患耳在9~16 kHz各频率听阈均高于健耳(P < 0.001);②DPOAE在3、4、6、8 kHz 4个高频频率检出率和反应幅值双耳差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);③ABRⅠ波患耳潜伏期为(1.55±0.17) ms,健耳潜伏期为(1.50±0.14) ms,患耳潜伏期较健耳延长(P < 0.05);④ECochG中-SP振幅耳间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),AP振幅及-SP/AP振幅比耳间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论 EHFA、DPOAE、ABR、ECochG检测对于耳鸣患者的耳蜗功能评价具有临床意义。
  • 加载中
  • 表 1  耳鸣患者常频PTA结果 dB HL,X±S

    侧别 0.25 kHz 0.5 kHz 1 kHz 2 kHz 4 kHz 8 kHz
    患耳 13.76±5.69 12.16±4.99 11.61±4.99 13.64±5.99 15.52±6.14 18.81±6.10
    健耳 12.52±5.77 11.32±5.51 11.22±5.54 12.64±5.85 15.08±6.62 17.88±6.41
    t 0.855 1.115 0.263 0.663 0.275 0.568
    P 0.399 0.273 0.795 0.512 0.785 0.561
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  耳鸣患者EHFA结果 dB HL,X±S

    侧别 9 kHz 10 kHz 11.2 kHz 12.5 kHz 14 kHz 16 kHz
    患耳 35.29±6.77 50.85±6.48 55.92±6.60 57.10±6.68 75.39±7.18 66.18±8.75
    健耳 18.04±6.09 18.10±6.07 25.83±5.83 31.73±6.28 40.58±6.99 35.85±7.99
    t 10.366 20.687 19.252 14.968 20.100 15.291
    P < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  耳鸣患者DPOAE不同频率检出率 %

    侧别 0.5 kHz 0.75 kHz 1 kHz 1.5 kHz 2 kHz 3 kHz 4 kHz 6 kHz 8 kHz
    患耳 42.40 66.70 75.80 97.00 87.90 84.80 72.70 66.70 42.42
    健耳 57.60 84.80 87.90 97.00 93.90 100.00 97.00 93.90 87.88
    χ2 1.515 2.970 1.630 0.000 0.733 5.410 7.543 7.759 13.235
    P 0.218 0.085 0.202 1.000 0.392 0.020 0.006 0.005 < 0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 4  耳鸣患者DPOAE不同频率反应幅值(信噪比)  dB SPL,X±S

    侧别 0.5 kHz 0.75 kHz 1 kHz 1.5 kHz 2 kHz 3 kHz 4 kHz 6 kHz 8 kHz
    患耳 3.23±5.94 6.74±6.50 9.03±7.47 13.98±5.32 14.65±6.67 14.13±7.34 11.21±9.08 10.46±8.72 8.14±5.83
    健耳 4.85±6.33 8.74±2.91 11.59±4.57 15.01±5.45 16.44±5.73 17.26±4.23 15.27±7.89 14.96±7.70 14.03±8.08
    t -1.118 -1.673 -1.838 -0.996 -1.685 -2.468 -2.775 -3.012 -3.546
    P 0.272 0.104 0.075 0.327 0.102 0.019 0.009 0.005 < 0.001
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 5  耳鸣患者ABR潜伏期及波间期参数值 ms,X±S

    侧别 Ⅰ~Ⅲ Ⅲ~Ⅴ Ⅰ~Ⅴ
    患耳 1.55±0.17 3.71±0.20 5.58±0.27 2.17±0.15 1.87±0.17 4.04±0.23
    健耳 1.50±0.14 3.68±0.23 5.55±0.28 2.18±0.16 1.86±0.19 4.05±0.21
    t 2.126 1.286 1.638 -0.671 0.364 -0.346
    P 0.041 0.208 0.111 0.507 0.718 0.732
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 6  耳鸣患者ECochG的-SP、AP振幅及-SP/AP振幅比 X±S

    侧别 -SP振幅 AP振幅 -SP/AP
    患耳 0.04±0.04 0.16±0.06 0.23±0.17
    健耳 0.03±0.03 0.23±0.10 0.14±0.15
    t 0.971 -3.607 2.070
    P 0.338 0.001 0.046
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    McCormack A, Edmondson-Jones M, Somerset S, et al. A systematic review of the reporting of tinnitus prevalence and severity[J]. Hear Res, 2016, 337: 70-79. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.05.009

    [2]

    Liberman MC, Epstein MJ, Cleveland SS, et al. Toward a Differential Diagnosis of Hidden Hearing Loss in Humans[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(9): e0162726. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162726

    [3]

    安俊南, 郑芸. 耳鸣发病机制研究进展[J]. 现代临床医学, 2021, 47(1): 57-60. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYCD202101019.htm

    [4]

    曹连杰. 感音神经性聋高频听力易损机制[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2010, 18(4): 401-404. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2010.04.029

    [5]

    Chen XH, LI J, Zhang C, et al. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in tinnitus patients with normal hearing[J]. Chin J Otol, 2019, 17(4): 532-535.

    [6]

    Grose JH, Buss E, Elmore H. Age-Related Changes in the Auditory Brainstem Response and Suprathreshold Processing of Temporal and Spectral Modulation[J]. Trends Hear, 2019, 23: 2331216519839615.

    [7]

    Shrestha BR, Chia C, Wu L, et al. Sensory Neuron Diversity in the Inner Ear Is Shaped by Activity[J]. Cell, 2018, 174(5): 1229-1246. e17. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.007

    [8]

    Zhang W, Peng Z, Yu S, et al. Loss of Cochlear Ribbon Synapse Is a Critical Contributor to Chronic Salicylate Sodium Treatment-Induced Tinnitus without Change Hearing Threshold[J]. Neural Plast, 2020, 2020: 3949161.

    [9]

    Liberman MC, Kujawa SG. Cochlear synaptopathy in acquired sensorineural hearing loss: Manifestations and mechanisms[J]. Hear Res, 2017, 349: 138-147. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.01.003

    [10]

    Gu JW, Herrmann BS, Levine RA, et al. Brainstem auditory evoked potentials suggest a role for the ventral cochlear nucleus in tinnitus[J]. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 2012, 13(6): 819-833. doi: 10.1007/s10162-012-0344-1

    [11]

    Hullfish J, Abenes I, Yoo HB, et al. Frontostriatal network dysfunction as a domain-general mechanism underlying phantom perception[J]. Hum Brain Mapp, 2019, 40(7): 2241-2251. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24521

    [12]

    冯帅, 李晓瑜, 罗扬拓, 等. 听阈正常耳鸣患者听性脑干反应潜伏期检测的特点及临床意义[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2019, 17(2): 209-213. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHER201902014.htm

    [13]

    Shi L, Liu L, He T, et al. Ribbon synapse plasticity in the cochleae of Guinea pigs after noise-induced silent damage[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(12): e81566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081566

    [14]

    庞功采, 孙毓晗, 柳柯. 隐匿性听力损失的临床特征、诱发因素和致病机制[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2019, 17(2): 170-175. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHER201902008.htm

    [15]

    夏红艳, 赵立东. 耳蜗电图对耳蜗传入突触病变诊断意义的探讨[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2021, 19(1): 146-150. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHER202101027.htm

    [16]

    兰家辉, 李明, 张剑宁. 耳鸣中枢机制的基础研究进展[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2018, 16(1): 102-106. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHER201801023.htm

    [17]

    Job A, Jaroszynski C, Kavounoudias A, et al. Functional Connectivity in Chronic Nonbothersome Tinnitus Following Acoustic Trauma: A Seed-Based Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study[J]. Brain Connect, 2020, 10(6): 279-291.

    [18]

    罗扬拓, 冯帅, 姜学钧, 等. 听觉中枢可塑性与耳鸣发生机制的研究进展[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2021, 35(11): 1038-1041. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCEH202111018.htm

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1357
  • PDF下载数:  604
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2022-01-24
刊出日期:  2022-05-03

目录