单侧全聋型突发性聋患者失匹配负波的初步研究

胡萍萍; 朱斌; 孟子珅; 袁玲; 曹诗瑶; 关兵

doi:10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2021.05.002

单侧全聋型突发性聋患者失匹配负波的初步研究

- 1.
  大连医科大学(辽宁大连，116000)
- 2.
  扬州大学临床医学院附属苏北人民医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科

详细信息

通讯作者: 朱斌，E-mail：zhubin0820@qq.com

中图分类号: R764.43

收稿日期: 2020-08-12

刊出日期: 2021-05-05

A preliminary study on the negative wave mismatch in patients with unilateral total sudden deafness

- 1.
  Dalian Medical University, Dalian, 116000, China
- 2.
  Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, North Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Clinical Medical College of Yangzhou University

More Information

Corresponding author: ZHU Bin, E-mail: zhubin0820@qq.com

Received Date: 12 August 2020

Publish Date: 05 May 2021

摘要

摘要: 目的观察单侧全聋型突发性聋(突聋)患者失匹配负波(MMN)的特点, 与正常人MMN相比较, 从而为探讨单侧全聋型突聋的病理生理机制和治疗提供理论依据。方法设26例单侧全聋型突聋患者作为实验组, 25名正常健康人为对照组, 分别对两组受试者进行MMN检查, 采用经典的oddball模式, 标准刺激和偏差刺激分别为1000 Hz和2000 Hz的短纯音测试两组受试者MMN, 观察两组MMN潜伏期及波幅的特点, 并比较两组间潜伏期及波幅的差异。结果 51例受试者中仅1例全聋型突聋患者未引出MMN波形, 其余均引出, 实验组MMN潜伏期为(162.03±38.64) ms, 波幅为(2.83±1.14)μV, 年龄为(48.64±10.27)岁; 对照组MMN潜伏期为(197.52±27.43) ms, 波幅为(2.58±1.07)μV, 年龄为(45.00±8.20)岁。两组间MMN潜伏期差异有统计学意义(P < 0.01), 波幅差异无统计学意义(P>0.05), 年龄差异亦无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论急性期突聋患者听觉中枢功能发生了改变, 推测可能急性期突聋患者听觉中枢出现相应应急变化, 从而使其功能发生了适应性改变, 这为日后探讨突聋的病理生理机制及治疗方案提供了进一步的参考依据。
- 突发性聋 /
- 失匹配负波 /
- 听觉中枢 /
- 听觉剥夺 /
- 听觉重塑
Abstract: Objective To observe the characteristics of different negativity negativity (MMN) in patients with unilateral sudden deafness, and compare them with normal MMN, in order to provide theoretical reference for discussing the pathogenesis of unilateral sudden deafness and their relationship with the auditory centers, and to provide theoretical basis for the treatment of sudden deafness in the future.Methods Twenty-six cases of unilateral total sudden deafness were recruited as experimental group, 25 cases of normal healthy people as control group, the MMN inspections was performed respectively, the two groups using classical mode of oddball, standard and deviation stimulate with 1000 Hz and 2000 Hz short pure tone test MMN respectively, to observe the MMN latency and amplitude characteristics, and compare the latent period and amplitude difference between the two groups.Results Among the 51 subjects, only 1 patient with unilateral total sudden deafness did not elicit MMN waveform, while the rest were all induced. The average incubation period of MMN in the experimental group was (162.03±38.64) ms, the average amplitude was (2.83±1.14)μV, and the mean age was (48.64±10.27) y. While the average incubation period of MMN in the control group was (197.52±27.43) ms, the average amplitude was (2.58±1.07)μV, and the mean age was (45.00±8.20) y. The MMN latency was significantly different between the two groups (P < 0.01). There was no statistical difference in amplitude between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no statistical difference in age between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion The latency period of MMN of unilateral total sudden deafness is shorter than that of the control group. It suggests that the auditory center function of patients with acute sudden deafness has changed, and we speculate that the auditory center of patients with acute sudden deafness may have corresponding emergency changes, so as to make its function have adaptive changes, which will provide further reference for the discussion of the pathophysiological mechanism and treatment of sudden deafness in the future.We speculated that acute unilateral auditory deprivation caused by unilateral total deafness sudden deafness has an impact on cerebral cortical auditory function, which provides further reference for the discussion of pathophysiological mechanism and treatment plan of sudden deafness in the future.
- sudden deafness /
- mismatched negative wave /
- auditory center /
- auditory deprivation /
- auditory reshape

HTML全文

图 1 实验组MMN

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 对照组MMN

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 实验组与对照组年龄、MMN潜伏期及波幅比较 x±s

组别	例数		年龄/岁	潜伏期/ms	波幅/μV
组别	男	女	年龄/岁	潜伏期/ms	波幅/μV
实验组	13	13	48.64±10.27	162.03±38.64	2.67±1.23
对照组	13	12	45.00±8.20	197.52±27.43	2.58±1.07
P			0.173	<0.001	0.783

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(18)

[1]	周霓. 突发性聋预后相关因素的研究进展[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2017, 31(4): 323-326. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCEH201704022.htm
[2]	张红茹, 孙艳萍, 陈涵, 等. 全聋型突发性耳聋临床预后分析[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉颅底外科杂志, 2016, 22(1): 54-57. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZEBY201601016.htm
[3]	郭瑜, 夏爽, 王鹏辉, 等. 单侧感音神经性耳聋患者听觉传导通路变化的fMRI研究[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2011, 30(6): 792-795. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCFS201106005.htm
[4]	Ko D, Kwon S, Lee GT, et al. Theta Oscillation Related to the Auditory Discrimination Process in Mismatch Negativity Oddball versus Control Paradigm[J]. J Clin Neurol, 2012, 8(1): 35-42. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2012.8.1.35
[5]	景艳, 梁建平, 彭璐, 等. 老年性聋患者听觉事件相关电位特征分析[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2017, 25(4): 353-356. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7299.2017.04.005
[6]	刘浩强, 赵立东. 失匹配负波(MMN)对听觉中枢言语识别功能的评估[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2018, 16(2): 227-233. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2018.02.019
[7]	Chandrasekhar SS, Tsai Do BS, Schwartz SR, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline: Sudden Hearing Loss(Update)[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2019, 161(1_suppl): S1-S45. doi: 10.1177/0194599819859885
[8]	Klemm E, Deutscher A, Mösges R. A present investigation of the epidemiology in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss[J]. Laryngorhinootologie, 2009, 88(8): 524-527. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1128133
[9]	Fan W, Zhang W, Li J, et al. Altered Contralateral Auditory Cortical Morphology in Unilateral Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2015, 36(10): 1622-1627. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000892
[10]	Tremblay KL, Piskosz M, Souza P. Effects of age and age-related hearing loss on the neural representation of speech cues[J]. Clin Neurophysiol, 2003, 114(7): 1332-1343. doi: 10.1016/S1388-2457(03)00114-7
[11]	Jerger J, Lew HL. Principles and clinical applications of auditory evoked potentials inthe geriatric population[J]. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am, 2004, 15(1): 235-250. doi: 10.1016/S1047-9651(03)00099-8
[12]	Molholm S, Martinez A, Ritter W, et al. The neural circuitry ofpre-attentive auditory change-detection: an fMRI study of pitch andduration mismatch negativity generators[J]. Cereb Cortex, 2005, 15(5): 545-551. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhh155
[13]	Lappe C, Steinsträter O, Pantev C. A beamformer analysis of MEG data reveals frontal generators of the musically elicited mismatch negativity[J]. PLoS One, 2013, 8(4): e61296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061296
[14]	Näätänen R, Sussman ES, Salisbury D, et al. Mismatch negativity(MMN)as an index of cognitive dysfunction[J]. Brain Topogr, 2014, 27(4): 451-466.
[15]	Sussman ES, Shafer VL. New perspectives on the mismatch negativity(MMN)component: an evolving tool in cognitive neuroscience[J]. Brain Topogr, 2014, 27(4): 425-427. doi: 10.1007/s10548-014-0381-7
[16]	冯源, 陈宇辰, 刘斌, 等. 单侧感音神经性耳聋患者低频振幅功能磁共振研究[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2014, 12(2): 224-227. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2014.02.09
[17]	Cardin V, Orfanidou E, Rönnberg J, et al. Dissociating cognitive and sensory neural plasticity in human superior temporal cortex[J]. Nat Commun, 2013, 4: 1473. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2463
[18]	Rachakonda T, Shimony JS, Coalson RS, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in children with unilateral hearing loss: a pilot study[J]. Front Syst Neurosci, 2014, 8: 87.