慢性鼻窦炎内镜术中使用可吸收鼻窦药物支架的疗效分析

万玉峰, 刘龙生, 徐盼盼, 等. 慢性鼻窦炎内镜术中使用可吸收鼻窦药物支架的疗效分析[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2020, 34(5): 417-420. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.05.007
引用本文: 万玉峰, 刘龙生, 徐盼盼, 等. 慢性鼻窦炎内镜术中使用可吸收鼻窦药物支架的疗效分析[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2020, 34(5): 417-420. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.05.007
WAN Yufeng, LIU Longsheng, XU Panpan, et al. Efficacy analysis of use of absorbable sinus drug stents in functional endoscopic sinus surgery[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2020, 34(5): 417-420. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.05.007
Citation: WAN Yufeng, LIU Longsheng, XU Panpan, et al. Efficacy analysis of use of absorbable sinus drug stents in functional endoscopic sinus surgery[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2020, 34(5): 417-420. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.05.007

慢性鼻窦炎内镜术中使用可吸收鼻窦药物支架的疗效分析

详细信息

Efficacy analysis of use of absorbable sinus drug stents in functional endoscopic sinus surgery

More Information
  • 目的 探讨功能性内镜鼻窦手术(FESS)术中置入可吸收鼻窦药物支架治疗慢性鼻窦炎的疗效。方法 将107例拟行FESS的慢性鼻窦炎患者分成支架组58例和非支架组49例,支架组术中使用鼻窦药物支架;非支架组术中未使用鼻窦药物支架。2组接受相同的术后治疗。术后随访1个月,术后3个月复查。疗效主要通过内镜检查评估,评估指标包括鼻窦黏膜是否充血水肿、中鼻甲有无黏连、有无囊泡或息肉样变黏膜形成、窦口有无狭窄或再次闭塞、鼻窦黏膜是否上皮化和术后是否干预6项。结果 支架组58例患者成功植入支架。术后1个月上述6项指标在支架组与非支架组之间的差异均有统计学意义,支架组术后并发症发生率及术后干预率均明显低于非支架组(均P < 0.01),支架组鼻窦黏膜上皮化发生率明显高于非支架组(P < 0.01)。术后3个月复查2组均全部完成鼻窦黏膜上皮化,而支架组术后并发症发生率及术后干预率仍均明显低于非支架组(P < 0.05或P < 0.01)。结论 FESS术中置入可吸收鼻窦药物支架治疗慢性鼻窦炎效果安全理想,在有效缓解鼻窦炎患者临床症状的同时能进一步控制并发症的产生。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  可吸收鼻窦药物支架系统

    图 2  鼻内镜下额窦手术

    表 1  支架组和非支架组术后并发症的发生情况比较

    组别 例数 黏膜充血水肿状态 有无黏连 有无囊泡或息肉样变黏膜
    1个月 3个月 1个月 3个月 1个月 3个月
    支架组 58 29(50.0) 0 3(5.2) 2(3.4) 14(24.1) 0
    非支架组 49 38(77.6) 0 14(28.6) 8(16.3) 33(67.3) 0
    χ2 - 8.612 9 - 10.882 1 5.066 8 24.021 4 -
    P - 0.003 3 - 0.001 0 0.024 4 < 0.000 1 -
    组别 例数 窦口有无狭窄或再次闭塞 鼻窦黏膜上皮化程度 术后干预情况
    1个月 3个月 1个月 3个月 1个月 3个月
    支架组 58 2(3.4) 0 28(48.3) 58(100.0) 14(24.1) 2(3.4)
    非支架组 49 13(26.5) 8(16.3) 11(22.4) 49(100.0) 33(67.3) 18(36.7)
    χ2 - 11.740 5 10.234 6 7.648 5 - 20.132 9 19.363 9
    P - 0.000 6 0.001 4 0.005 7 - 0.000 1 < 0.000 1
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Sedaghat AR. Chronic Rhinosinusitis[J]. Am Fam Physician, 2017, 96(8): 500-506.

    [2]

    Campbell RG, Kennedy DW. What is new and promising with drug-eluting stents in sinus surgery?[J]. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2014, 22(1): 2-7. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000012

    [3]

    Taulu R, Bizaki AJ, Numminen J, et al. A prospective, randomized clinical study comparing drug eluting stent therapy and intranasal corticoid steroid therapy in the treatment of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis[J]. Rhinology, 2017, 55(3): 218-226. doi: 10.4193/Rhino16.070

    [4]

    Hauser LJ, Turner JH, Chandra RK. Trends in the Use of Stents and Drug-Eluting Stents in Sinus Surgery[J]. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 2017, 50(3): 565-571. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2017.01.007

    [5]

    Yaniv D, Shlossberg L, Yaniv E. A Prospective Study on the Safety and Effectiveness of a Composite Sinus Stent for Use After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery[J]. Am J Rhinol Allergy, 2019, 33(1): 17-25. doi: 10.1177/1945892418803101

    [6]

    Jankowski R, Gallet P, Nguyen DT, et al. Chronic rhinosinusitis of adults: new definition, new diagnosis[J]. Rev Prat, 2019, 69(3): 274-278.

    [7]

    Jankowski R, Nguyen DT, Russel A, et al. Chronic nasal dysfunction[J]. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis, 2018, 135(1): 41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.anorl.2017.11.006

    [8]

    Levine CG, Casiano RR. Revision Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery[J]. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 2017, 50(1): 143-164. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2016.08.012

    [9]

    Alsharif S, Jonstam K, van Zele T, et al. Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Type-2 CRS wNP: An Endotype-Based Retrospective Study[J]. Laryngoscope, 2019, 129(6): 1286-1292. doi: 10.1002/lary.27815

    [10]

    Akiyama K, Makihara S, Uraguchi K, et al. Impact of Preoperative Systemic Corticosteroids on the Histology and Diagnosis of Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis[J]. Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 2019, 179(2): 81-88. doi: 10.1159/000496437

    [11]

    Tajudeen BA, Ganti A, Kuhar HN, et al. The presence of eosinophil aggregates correlates with increased postoperative prednisone requirement[J]. Laryngoscope, 2019, 129(4): 794-799. doi: 10.1002/lary.27693

    [12]

    Hopkins C. Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps[J]. N Engl J Med, 2019, 381(1): 55-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1800215

    [13]

    Adriaensen GFJPM, Lim KH, Fokkens WJ. Safety and efficacy of a bioabsorbable fluticasone propionate-eluting sinus dressing in postoperative management of endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized clinical trial[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2017, 7(8): 813-820. doi: 10.1002/alr.21963

    [14]

    Luk LJ, DelGaudio JM. Topical Drug Therapies for Chronic Rhinosinusitis[J]. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 2017, 50(3): 533-543. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2017.01.005

    [15]

    Bassiouni A, Chen PG, Naidoo Y, et al. Clinical significance of middle turbinate lateralization after endoscopic sinus surgery[J]. Laryngoscope, 2015, 125(1): 36-41. doi: 10.1002/lary.24858

    [16]

    Chaaban MR, Baillargeon JG, Baillargeon G, et al. Use of balloon sinuplasty in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis in the United States[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2017, 7(6): 600-608. doi: 10.1002/alr.21939

    [17]

    Chaaban MR, Rana N, Baillargeon J, et al. Outcomes and Complications of Balloon and Conventional Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery[J]. Am J Rhinol Allergy, 2018, 32(5): 388-396. doi: 10.1177/1945892418782248

    [18]

    Huang Z, Huang Q, Zhou B, et al. Bioabsorbable steroid-eluting sinus stents for patients with refractory frontal diseases undergoing a revision Draf 3 procedure: a case series[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2019, 139(7): 636-642. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2019.1592222

    [19]

    Han JK, Kern RC. Topical therapies for management of chronic rhinosinusitis: steroid implants[J]. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol, 2019, 9(S1): S22-S26. doi: 10.1002/alr.22344

  • 加载中

(2)

(1)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1786
  • PDF下载数:  1239
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2019-09-18
刊出日期:  2020-05-05

目录