甲状软骨成形声带内移术治疗单侧声带运动不良的初步探讨

高为华, 朱天照, 秦永, 等. 甲状软骨成形声带内移术治疗单侧声带运动不良的初步探讨[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2020, 34(3): 218-222-226. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.03.008
引用本文: 高为华, 朱天照, 秦永, 等. 甲状软骨成形声带内移术治疗单侧声带运动不良的初步探讨[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2020, 34(3): 218-222-226. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.03.008
GAO Weihua, ZHU Tianzhao, QIN Yong, et al. Preliminary study of medialization thyroplasty for unilateral vocal fold immobility[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2020, 34(3): 218-222-226. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.03.008
Citation: GAO Weihua, ZHU Tianzhao, QIN Yong, et al. Preliminary study of medialization thyroplasty for unilateral vocal fold immobility[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2020, 34(3): 218-222-226. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.03.008

甲状软骨成形声带内移术治疗单侧声带运动不良的初步探讨

详细信息

Preliminary study of medialization thyroplasty for unilateral vocal fold immobility

More Information
  • 目的 初步探讨甲状软骨成形声带内移术治疗单侧声带运动不良的可行性及其疗效。方法 8例单侧声带运动不良患者, 局部麻醉下在甲状软骨开窗, 置入预成型的硅酮支架, 将麻痹的声带向内侧移位, 改善声门闭合状态。手术前后均采用纤维喉镜录像、嗓音主观分析及喉部薄层CT检查, 评估声门闭合、嗓音改善及植入物位置。结果 8例患者嗓音障碍指数术前为91.5(64.5, 97.5), 术后为22.5(5.0, 47.5), 术后显著小于术前(P < 0.05)。GRBAS结果: G、R、B、A术后均显著小于术前(P < 0.05);S术前术后均为0。声门关闭不全评分术前为1.0(1.0, 1.0), 术后为4.0(2.5, 5.0), 术后显著高于术前(P < 0.05)。术后喉部CT检查患侧声带明显内移。术前有误吸的4例患者术后症状明显改善。8例患者随访5~48个月, 无一例出现并发症。结论 甲状软骨成形声带内移术有效地改善了单侧声带运动不良患者的发声和生活质量。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  手术方法示意图

    图 2  手术前后发声位声门闭合对照图

    图 3  同一患者手术前后CT对比

    图 4  声带内移效果不佳与内移满意患者CT对比

    图 5  例6患者术前CT测量患侧声带长度

    表 1  8例UVFI患者的临床资料

    例序 性别 年龄/岁 侧别 病因 病程/月 随访时间/月 误吸
    1 65 甲状腺手术 18 48
    2 36 胸腔手术 6 42
    3 50 咽旁间隙神经鞘瘤切除术后 24 42
    4 49 甲状腺术后 50 36
    5 34 甲状腺术后 108 28
    6 73 甲状腺术后 17 26
    7 59 肺叶切除术 204 24
    8 53 肺癌术后 16 5
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 2  8例患者手术前后VHI-30、GRBAS、声门关闭不全评分结果 

    例序 VHI-30评分 G R B A S 声门关闭不全评分
    术前 术后 术前 术后 术前 术后 术前 术后 术前 术后 术前 术后 术前 术后
    1 98 8 2.5 0.8 1.5 0.8 2.5 0.2 1.0 0 0 0 1 5
    2 75 10 2.2 0 1.0 0 2.2 0 1.0 0 0 0 1 4
    3 95 4 3.0 1.2 2.0 1.0 3.0 1.2 1.5 0.5 0 0 1 5
    4 96 55 2.0 0.8 1.0 0.8 2.0 0 0.5 0 0 0 1 4
    5 88 40 1.2 1.0 1.2 1.0 0.8 0 0 0 0 0 2 4
    6 104 45 2.5 1.2 1.2 1.0 2.5 1.2 1.5 0.8 0 0 1 2
    7 41 3 2.5 0.5 1.0 0.5 2.5 0 1.2 0 0 0 1 5
    8 61 35 3.0 1.2 2.0 1.0 3.0 1.2 1.5 0 0 0 1 2
    注:例3、例8术前均为近耳语。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表 3  VHI-30、GRBAS、声门关闭不全评分非参数配对检验统计结果(n=8)

    中位数 四分位距 P
    VHI-30
      术前 91.5 64.5,97.5 0.012
      术后 22.5 5.0,47.5
    GRBAS
      G术前 2.50 2.05,2.88 0.012
      G术后 0.90 0.58,1.20
      R术前 1.20 1.00,1.90 0.011
      R术后 0.90 0.58,1.00
      B术前 2.50 2.05,2.88 0.012
      B术后 0.10 0,1.20
      A术前 1.10 0.63,1.50 0.017
      A术后 0 0,0.38
      S术前 0 0
      S术后 0 0
    声门关闭不全
      术前 1.0 1.0,1.0 0.011
      术后 4.0 2.5,5.0
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Cohen SM, Dupont WD, Courey MS. Quality-of-life impact of nonneoplastic voice disorders: a meta-analysis[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2006, 115(2): 128-134. doi: 10.1177/000348940611500209

    [2]

    徐文, 李红艳, 胡蓉, 等. 嗓音障碍指数量表中文版信度和效度评价[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2008, 43(9): 670-675. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1673-0860.2008.09.008

    [3]

    Hirano M, Arnold GE, Winckel F, et al. Clinical examination of voice in disorders of human communication[M]. New York: Springer, 1981: 81-84.

    [4]

    Chhetri DK, Gerratt BR, Kreiman J, et al. Combined arytenoid adduction and laryngeal reinnervation in the treatment of vocal fold paralysis[J]. Laryngoscope, 1999, 109(12): 1928-1936. doi: 10.1097/00005537-199912000-00006

    [5]

    Dejonckere PH, Bradley P, Clemente P, et al. A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of(phonosurgical)treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Guidelines elaborated by the Committee on Phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society(ELS)[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2001, 258(2): 77-82. doi: 10.1007/s004050000299

    [6]

    Montgomery WW, Blaugrund SM, Varvares MA. Thyroplasty: a new approach[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 1993, 102(8 Pt 1): 571-579.

    [7]

    Kelchner LN, Stemple JC, Gerdeman E, et al. Etiology, pathophysiology, treatment choices, and voice results for unilateral adductor vocal fold paralysis: a 3-year retrospective[J]. J Voice, 1999, 13(4): 592-601. doi: 10.1016/S0892-1997(99)80013-7

    [8]

    Rosen CA. Complications of phonosurgery: results of a national survey[J]. Laryngoscope, 1998, 108(11 Pt 1): 1697-1703.

    [9]

    高颖娜, 陈世彩, 陈东辉, 等. 颈襻前根修复单侧喉返神经损伤的疗效分析[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2018, 53(9): 655-659. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2018.09.004

    [10]

    Friedrich G, de Jong F, Mahieu HF, et al. Laryngeal framework surgery: a proposal for classification and nomenclature by the Phonosurgery Committee of the European Laryngological Society[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2001, 258(8): 389-396. doi: 10.1007/s004050100375

    [11]

    Ramacle M, Lawson G, Hedayat A, et al. Medialization framework surgery for voice improvement after endoscopic cordectomy[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2001, 258(6): 267-271. doi: 10.1007/s004050100350

    [12]

    Zeitels SM, Jarboe J, Franco RA. Phonosurgical reconstruction of early glottic cancer[J]. Laryngoscope, 2001, 111(10): 1862-1865. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200110000-00036

    [13]

    Young VN, Zullo TG, Rosen CA. Analysis of laryngeal framework surgery: 10-year follow-up to a national survey[J]. Laryngoscope, 2010, 120(8): 1602-1608. doi: 10.1002/lary.21004

  • 加载中

(5)

(3)

计量
  • 文章访问数:  1689
  • PDF下载数:  778
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2019-09-14
刊出日期:  2020-03-05

目录