喉癌患者认知功能特征研究

宋开艳; 徐勇; 高伟; 郝文天; 姚景春; 王磊; 蒋宏; 高泽慧; 王雪瑞; 王斌全

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2018.18.008

喉癌患者认知功能特征研究

- 1. 山西医科大学(太原, 030001);
- 2. 山西医科大学第一医院精神卫生科山西医科大学第一医院认知障碍与睡眠障碍多学科诊疗中心;
- 3. 山西医科大学第一医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科耳鼻咽喉头颈肿瘤山西省重点实验室;
- 4. 山西省肿瘤医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科
基金项目:
山西省头颈部恶性肿瘤精准诊疗重点科技创新平台专项（No：201605D151003）；山西医科大学大学生创新创业校级项目（No：20160902）；山西医科大学第一医院杰出优秀青年基金培育项目（No：YR1601）；山西省优秀人才科技创新项目（No：201605D211029）

详细信息

通讯作者: 王斌全,E-mail:wbq_xy@sxent.org

中图分类号: R739.65

收稿日期: 2018-04-18

Features of cognitive function in patients with laryngeal carcinoma

- 1. Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, 030001, China;
- 2. Department of Psychiatry, the First Hospital, Shanxi Medical University; MDT Center for Cognitive Impairment and Sleep Disorders, the First Hospital, Shanxi Medical University;
- 3. Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, the First Hospital, Shanxi Medical University; Shanxi Key Laboratory of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Cancer;
- 4. Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shanxi Tumor Hospital

More Information

Corresponding author: WANG Binquan, E-mail: wbq_xy@sxent.org

Received Date: 18 April 2018

摘要

摘要: 目的：研究喉癌患者与健康志愿者认知功能的差异。方法：以山西省两所三级甲等医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科首发的喉癌患者和招募的同年龄（±3岁）、性别匹配以及文化程度相近的健康志愿者为研究对象，以韦氏记忆量表为研究工具，评估研究对象的认知现状。结果：喉癌组与对照组在年龄、性别与文化程度上无显著性差异（P>0.05）；喉癌组的记忆商评分比对照组低，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；喉癌组与对照组在韦氏记忆量表中除经历、定向、联想测验外，其余测验结果都有显著性差异（P<0.05）。结论：喉癌患者在记忆力（如长时记忆、短时记忆、瞬时记忆）、注意力（如图片、再认、触觉）及计算力（如心智积累）方面比同年龄（±3岁）、性别匹配以及文化程度相近的健康志愿者差，喉癌患者表现出认知功能损害或者低下，是患者康复过程中应重视的恢复环节。癌症相关认知障碍的早期发现有助于帮助癌症患者早期改善认知功能，减轻家属及社会负担，促进患者更好地回归社会。
- 喉肿瘤 /
- 癌症相关认知障碍 /
- 认知功能
Abstract: Objective: To study the differences in cognitive function between patients with laryngeal carcinoma and healthy volunteers. Method: Patients with laryngeal carcinoma who have been first diagnosed with laryngeal carcinoma, but not received treatment at the Department of Otolaryngology in two hospitals in Shanxi Province and healthy volunteers of the same age, gender-matched and similar education were studied for the purpose to evaluate the cognitive status by using the Wechsler memory scale.Result: No significant difference of age, gender and educational level was found between both groups(P>0.05).The score of Memory Quotient was significantly lower in the laryngeal carcinoma group than that in healthy control group (P<0.05). There were significant differences in the results of Wechsler memory scale except for Experience, Orientation and Association test (P<0.05).Conclusion: The memory, attention and computing power of patients in the laryngeal carcinoma group were not as good as those of patients in the healthy control group. Patients with laryngeal carcinoma have cognitive impairment or lower ability, so we need to pay more attention to the patients during their rehabilitation. The early detection of cancer-related cognitive impairments can help patients improve their cognitive function early, reduce the burden on their families and society, and promote better return of patients to society.
- laryngeal neoplasms /
- cancer-related cognitive impairment /
- cognitive function

HTML全文

参考文献(20)

[1]	WEFEL J S, KESLER S R, NOLL K R, et al.Clinical Characteristics, pathophysiology, and management of noncentral nervous system cancer-related cognitive impairment in adults[J].CA Cancer J Clin, 2015, 65:123-138.
[2]	SHORT P F, VASEY J J, TUNCELI K.Employment pathways in a large cohort of adult cancer survivors[J].Cancer, 2005, 103:1292-301.
[3]	WILLIAMS A M, JANELSINS M C, VAN WIJNGAARDEN E.Cognitive function in cancer survivors:analysis of the 1999-2002 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey[J].Support Care Cancer, 2016, 24:2155-2162.
[4]	NELLI B, MONA M, KAREN S K.Confronting chemobrain:an in-depth look at survivors' reports of impact on work, social networks, and health care response[J].J Cancer Surviv, 2009, 3:223-232.
[5]	姚静, 孙学礼, 王洪明.正常成人认知功能与年龄、性别、受教育程度的关系[J].中国临床心理学杂志, 2004, 12(4):414-416.
[6]	龚耀先.修订韦氏记忆量表[A].中国心理学会第三次会员代表大会及建会60周年学术会议(全国第四届心理学学术会议)文摘选集(下)[C].中国心理学会, 1981:3.
[7]	李焰生.中国防治认知功能障碍专家共识[J].中华老年医学杂志, 2006, 45(7):171-173.
[8]	世界卫生组织.国际功能、残疾和健康分类[M].日内瓦:世界卫生组织, 2001:3-4.
[9]	FRISONI G B, FRATIGLIONI L, FASTBOM J, et al.Mild cognitive impairment in the population and physical health data on 1, 435individuals aged 75to 95[J].J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 2000, 55:M322-328.
[10]	TERVO S, KIVIPELTO M, HÄNNINEN T, et al.Incidence and risk factors for mild cognitive impairment:apopulation-based three-year follow-up study of cognitively healthy elderly subjects[J].Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord, 2004, 17:196-203.
[11]	赵黔鲁, 郑华光, 王拥军.血管性认知功能障碍的发生机制[J].中国卒中杂志, 2007, 2(6):53-56.
[12]	BRAY V J, DHILLON H M, VARDY J L.Cancer-related cognitive impairment in adult cancer survivors:A review of the literature[J].Cancer Forum, 2017, 41:45-54.
[13]	WANG L, APPLE A C, SCHROEDER M P, et al.Reduced prefrontal activation during working and longterm memory tasks and impaired patient-reported cognition among cancer survivors postchemotherapy compared with healthy controls[J].Cancer, 2015, 122:258-268.
[14]	KESLER S R, KENT J S, O'HARA R.Prefrontal cortex and executive function impairments in primary breast cancer[J].Arch Neurol, 2011, 68:1447-1453.
[15]	JANELSINS M C, KESLER S R, AHLES T A, et al.Prevalence, mechanisms, and management of cancerrelated cognitive impairment[J].Int Rev Psychiatry, 2014, 26:102-113.
[16]	TANIMUKAI H.[Cancer-related Cognitive Impairment:Current Knowledge and Future Challenges] [J].Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi, 2015, 117:585-600.
[17]	HEDE K.Chemobrain is real but may need new name[J].J Natl Cancer Inst, 2008, 100:162-163, 169.
[18]	MCDOUGALL G J, BECKER H, ACEE T W, et al Symptom management of affective and cognitive disturbance with a group of cancer survivors[J].Arch Psychiatr Nurs, 2011, 25:24-35.
[19]	REID-ARNDT S A, MATSUDA S, COX C R.Tai Chi effects on neuropsychological, emotional, and physical functioning following cancer treatment:apilot study[J].Complement Ther Clin Pract, 2012, 18:26-30.
[20]	VON AH D, STOREY S, JANSEN C E, et al.Coping strategies and interventions for cognitive changes in patients with cancer[J].Semin Oncol Nurs, 2013, 29:288-299.