耳后注射联合口服激素治疗平坦下降型突发性聋的临床疗效分析

高妍; 王春利; 郑艳

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2017.21.004

耳后注射联合口服激素治疗平坦下降型突发性聋的临床疗效分析

- 新疆医科大学第二附属医院耳鼻咽喉科(乌鲁木齐, 830038)

详细信息

通讯作者: 郑艳, E-mail:zy91900@sina.com

中图分类号: R764.43

收稿日期: 2017-06-20

Clinical curative effect analysis of postauricular topical injection combining with oral hormone in the treatment of the flat type of sudden hearing loss

- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, the Affiliated Second Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, 830038, China

More Information

Corresponding author: ZHENG Yan, E-mail: zy91900@sina.com

Received Date: 20 June 2017

摘要

摘要: 目的: 分析耳后注射联合口服激素治疗平坦下降型突发性聋的临床疗效。方法: 收集2015年以来收治的128例平坦下降型突发性聋患者的资料,随机分为耳后注射组(64例,注射用甲泼尼龙琥珀酸钠40 mg加利多卡因2.5 ml,耳后沟局部注射,隔日1次,联合晨起顿服甲泼尼龙片24 mg,连服3 d)和非耳后注射组(64例,晨起顿服甲泼尼龙片24 mg,连服3 d)。采用SPSS 17.0软件对2组患者的听力疗效进行统计分析。结果: ①耳后注射组中15例(23.4%)治愈,9例(14.1%)显效,24例(37.5%)有效,16例(25.0%)无效,总有效率为75.0%(48/64);非耳后注射组中13例(20.3%)治愈,7例(10.9%)显效,21例(32.8%)有效,23例(35.9%)无效,总有效率为64.1%(41/64);2组患者疗效对比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);②耳后注射组250~8 000 Hz中的低、中、高频等5个不同频率段提高依次为(26.48±6.23)dBHL,(23.24±4.21)dBHL,(21.89±7.34)dBHL,(26.07±7.01)dBHL,(25.75±5.14)dBHL。耳后注射组250~500 Hz及250~4 000 Hz频率段听力改善明显高于非耳后注射组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论: 耳后注射联合口服激素治疗平坦下降型突发性聋患者疗效较口服激素更佳。
- 耳后注射 /
- 甲泼尼龙 /
- 聋 /
- 突发性
Abstract: Objective: To analyze the clinical curative effect of postauricular topical injection combining with oral hormone in the treatment of the flat type of sudden hearing loss.Method: Data of 128 patients with the Sudden hearing lossfrom year 2015 till now were collected, and randomly divided into two groups:postauricular topical injection group (methylprednisolone sodium succinatefor injection 40 mg+linocaine 2.5 ml, retroauricular groove topical injection, qod, combining with taking methylprednisolone tablets 24 mg in the morning for 3 days) and non-postauricular injection group (take methylprednisolone tablets 24 mg in the morning for 3 days). Use SPSS 17.0 software to analyze the hearing curativeeffect of these two groups statistically.Result: ①The cure rate of postauricular injection group:23.4%(15 cases), effect appear:14.1%(9 cases), valid:37.5% (24 cases), invalid:25.0%(16 cases), total effective rate:75%(48/64).The difference compare of these two group has a statistically significant (P<0.05).②The cure rate of the flat type patients with the postauricular injection treatment among the total 64 cases is 23.4%, which is higher than the patients without the postauricular injection treatment.The difference compare of these two group has a statistically significant (P<0.05).③The incrementsof the postauricular injection group in 250-8 000 Hz, which is divided into7different frequencies, from low to high, are (26.48±6.23)dBHL, (23.24±4.21)dBHL, (21.89±7.34)dBHL, (26.07±7.01)dBHL, (25.75±5.14)dBHL. The mean value compare of frequency 250-500 Hz and 250-4 000 Hz of these two group has a statistically significant (P<0.05).Conclusion: The curative effect of postauricular topical injection combining with oral hormone in the treatment of the flat type of sudden hearing loss is better than only oral hormone.
- postauricular injection /
- methylprednisolone /
- hearing loss /
- sudden

HTML全文

参考文献(14)

[1]	中国突发性聋多中心临床研究协作组.中国突发性聋分型治疗的多中心临床研究[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2013, 48 (5):355-361.
[2]	STACHLER R J, CHANDRASEKHAR S S, ARCHER S M, et al.American Academy of OtolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery.Clinical practice guideline:sudden hearing loss[J].Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2012, 146:S1-S35.
[3]	MICHEL O, DEUSCHE GESELLSCHAFTFÜR HALSNASEN-OHREN-HEILKUNDE, KOPF-UND HALSCHIRURGIE.The tevised version of the German guidelines "sudden idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss"[J].Laryngorhinootologie, 2011, 90:290-293.
[4]	余力生, 杨仕明.突发性聋的临床研究进展[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2008, 43 (11):870-874.
[5]	李昕琚, 梁勇, 蒋涛, 等.突发性聋临床实践指南发布[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2012, 20 (6):600-612.
[6]	杨晓琦, 余力生, 马鑫.耳后注射复方倍他米松治疗顽固性低频下降型感音神经性聋[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2007, 42 (11):814-816.
[7]	LI J, YU L, XIA R, et al.Postauricular hypodermic injection to treat inner ear disorders:experimental feasibility study using magnetic resonance imaging and pharmacokinetic comparison[J].J Laryngol Otol, 2013, 127:239-245.
[8]	李晶兢, 余力生, 夏睿, 等.磁共振成像观察耳后给药促进药物进入内耳的可行性[J].中华耳科学杂志, 2012, 10 (2):144-148.
[9]	YANG J, WU H, ZHANG P, et al.The pharmacokinetic profiles of dexamethasone and methylprednisolone concentration in perilymph and plasma following systemic and local administration[J].Acta Otolaryngol, 2008, 128:496.
[10]	静媛媛, 余力生, 李兴启.耳后注射复方倍他米松豚鼠血浆中药代动力学特征[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2009, 17 (4):354-357.
[11]	张运波, 杨艺全, 习国平, 等.乳突骨膜下注射甲泼尼龙琥珀酸钠治疗突发性聋[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2012, 20 (4):375-376.
[12]	王明明, 樊兆民, 侯志强, 等.糖皮质激素局部注射与全身应用在特发性突发性聋分型治疗中的疗效[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2014, 49 (1):11-15.
[13]	静媛媛, 余力生, 马鑫, 等.耳后注射甲强龙治疗难治性突发性聋疗效分析[J].中华耳科学杂志, 2014, 12 (3):452-454.
[14]	赵群, 王英力, 王洪芹, 等.耳后注射甲强龙治疗突发性聋临床研究[J].中华耳科学杂志, 2015, 13 (4):714-716.