脑白质病变程度对语前聋患儿人工耳蜗植入术后听觉言语康复的影响

张雪媛; 梁茂金; 刘佳浩; 李湘辉; 郑亿庆; 翁胤仑

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2017.08.005

脑白质病变程度对语前聋患儿人工耳蜗植入术后听觉言语康复的影响

- 1 中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院耳鼻喉科中山大学听力与言语研究所(广州, 510120);
- 2 中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院神经外科
基金项目:
国家自然科学基金项目 (No:81301609), 国家自然科学基金项目 (No:81570935) 资助

详细信息

通讯作者: 郑亿庆,E-mail:yiqingzheng@hotmail.com; 翁胤仑,E-mail:yearonyung@126.com

中图分类号: R764.43

收稿日期: 2017-02-07

The effection of white matter abnormality to auditory and speech rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in prelingual deafness children

- 1 Department of Otolaryngology, Institute of Hearing and Speech-Language Science, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China;
- 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University

More Information

Corresponding authors: ZHENG Yiqing ; WENG Yinlun

Received Date: 07 February 2017

摘要

摘要: 目的: 评价脑白质发育异常的极重度感音神经性聋患儿人工耳蜗植入术后的听觉言语康复效果与脑白质病变程度的关系。方法: 回顾性分析35例行人工耳蜗植入术的脑白质发育异常患儿(实验组),并选取35例植入年龄匹配、耳蜗正常的极重度感音神经性聋患儿作为对照组。根据患儿术前MRI表现进行脑白质病变评测(Scheltens量表评分),术后6、12、24个月采用听觉行为(CAP)和言语可懂度(SIR)分级标准对两组患儿的听力及言语恢复水平分别评分。结果: 经统计学分析,实验组术后6个月的CAP得分、SIR得分均低于对照组(P<0.05),术后12、24个月的CAP得分与对照组无明显差异,SIR得分低于对照组(P<0.05)。其中Scheltens分级越高的患儿,CAP和SIR得分越低。结论: 脑白质发育异常的语前聋患儿人工耳蜗植入术后听觉感知及言语康复效果与脑白质病变程度有关,病变累及范围越广,听觉和言语康复水平越低,言语康复效果受脑白质病变程度影响更为显著。
- 脑白质病变 /
- 语前聋 /
- 人工耳蜗植入 /
- 听觉言语康复
Abstract: Objective: To investigatethe effection of white matter abnormality to auditory and speech rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in prelingual deafness children.Method: Thirty-five children with white matter abnormality were included in this study. The degree of leukoaraiosis was evaluated by Scheltens scale based on MRI.The hearing and speechrecovery level was rated by auditory behavior grading standards(CAP) and speech intelligibility grading standards(SIR) at 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months post operation.Result: The CAP scores and SIR scores of the children with white matter abnormality were lower than those of the control group at 6 months after operation (P<0.05).The SIR scores of the children with white matter abnormality at 12 months and 24 months post operation were significantly lower than those of the control group.There was no statistically significant difference between the CAP scores of the two groups at 12 and 24 months after operation(P>0.05).Schelten classification had a greater impact on SIR scores than on CAP scores.Conclusion: The effect of white matter abnormality on auditory and speech rehabilitation after cochlear implantation was related to the degree of leukoencephalopathy. When the lesion of white matter abnormality was larger, the level of hearing and verbal rehabilitation was lower, and the speech rehabilitation was more significantly impacted by white matter lesions degree.
- white matter abnormality /
- prelingual deafness /
- cochlear implantation /
- auditory and speech rehabilitation

HTML全文

参考文献(22)

[1]	FALLON J B, IRVINE D R, SHEPHERD R K.Cochlear implants and brain plasticity[J]. Hear Res, 2008, 238:110-117.
[2]	LAPOINTE A, VIAMONTE C, MORRISS M C, et al.Central nervous system findings by magnetic resonance in children with profound sensorineural hearing loss[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2006, 70:863-868.
[3]	MOON I J, KIM E Y, PARK G Y,et al.The clinical significance of preoperative brain magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric cochlear implant recipients[J]. Audiol Neurootol,2012,17:373-380.
[4]	ALLEN M C, NIKOLOPOULOS T P, O'DONOGHUE G M.Speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation[J]. Am J Otol,1998,19:742-746.
[5]	SCHELTENS P, BARKHOF F, LEYS D,et al.A semiquantative rating scale for the assessment of signal hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging[J]. J Neurol Sci,1993,114:7-12.
[6]	VICKERS D, KITTERICK P, VERSCHUUR C, et al.Issues in Cochlear Implant Candidacy[J]. Cochlear Implants Int, 2016, 17 Suppl 1:1-2.
[7]	VICKERS D, DE RAEVE L, GRAHAM J.International survey of cochlear implant candidacy[J]. Cochlear Implants Int, 2016, 17 Suppl 1:36-41.
[8]	INDER T E, WARFIELD S K, WANG H, et al.Abnormal cerebral structure is present at term in premature infants[J]. Pediatrics, 2005, 115:286-294.
[9]	INZITARI D, SIMONI M, PRACUCCI G, et al.Risk of rapid global functional decline in elderly patients with severe cerebral age-related white matter changes: the LADIS study[J]. Arch Intern Med, 2007,167:81-88.
[10]	WILEY S, MEINZEN-DERR J, CHOO D.Auditory skills development among children with developmental delays and cochlear implants[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol,2008, 117:711-718.
[11]	LEE Y M, KIM L S, JEONG S W, et al.Performance of children with mental retardation after cochlear implantation: speech perception, speech intelligibility, and language development[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2010, 130:924-934.
[12]	STEVEN R A, GREEN K M, BROOMFIELD S J, et al.Cochlear implantation in children with cerebral palsy[J]. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2011, 75:1427-1430.
[13]	LUTHRA S.1418 Leukodystrophy & Its Effects on Rehabilitation of Children with Cochlear Implant: A Preliminary Case Study[J]. Pediatric Res, 2010, 68:701-701.
[14]	RADANOVIC M, MANSUR L L, AZAMBUJA M J, et al.Contribution to the evaluation of language disturbances in subcortical lesions: a pilot study[J]. Arq Neuropsiquiatr, 2004, 62:51-57.
[15]	JODZIO K, DRUMM D A, NYKA W M, et al.The contribution of the left and right hemispheres to early recovery from aphasia: a SPECT prospective study[J]. Neuropsychol Rehabil, 2005, 15:588-604.
[16]	MURDOCH B E.Subcortical brain mechanisms in speech and language[J]. Folia Phoniatr Logop, 2001, 53:233-251.
[17]	RADANOVIC M, SCAFF M.Speech and language disturbances due to subcortical lesions[J]. Brain Lang, 2003, 84:337-352.
[18]	PANTONI L, SIMONI M, PRACUCCI G, et al.Visual rating scales for age-related white matter changes (leukoaraiosis): can the heterogeneity be reduced[J]?Stroke, 2002, 33:2827-2833.
[19]	RINGELSTEIN E B, NABAVI D G.Cerebral small vessel diseases: cerebral microangiopathies[J]. Curr Opin Neurol, 2005, 18:179-188.
[20]	JANSSON-VERKASALO E, EGGERS K, JARVENPAA A, et al.Atypical central auditory speech-sound discrimination in children who stutter as indexed by the mismatch negativity[J]. J Fluency Disord, 2014, 41:1-11.
[21]	DALIRI A, MAX L.Electrophysiological evidence for a general auditory prediction deficit in adults who stutter[J]. Brain Lang, 2015, 150:37-44.
[22]	DALIRI A, MAX L.Modulation of auditory processing during speech movement planning is limited in adults who stutter[J]. Brain Lang, 2015, 143:59-68.