鼓膜切开吸引刀与改良置管器在鼓膜置管术中的应用

钟庄龙; 汤娟; 温莹浩; 钟纯; 邱永亮

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2017.06.012

鼓膜切开吸引刀与改良置管器在鼓膜置管术中的应用

- 萍乡市人民医院耳鼻咽喉科(江西萍乡, 337000)

详细信息

通讯作者: 钟庄龙, E-mail:395030347@qq.com

中图分类号: R764.21

收稿日期: 2016-12-16

Application of a modified tympanic membrane surgical knife with suction and tube device in myringotomy with ventilation tube placement

- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Pingxiang People's Hospital, Pingxiang, 337000, China

More Information

Corresponding author: ZHONG Zhuanglong, E-mail: 395030347@qq.com

Received Date: 16 December 2016

摘要

摘要: 目的: 探讨采用鼓膜切开吸引刀与改良置管器置T型管行鼓膜置管术治疗分泌性中耳炎的临床疗效。方法: 对2014-06-2015-12期间收治的87例分泌性中耳炎患者,随机分组为普通法置管组及改良法置管组。对总有效率、术后3个月内脱管率、瘢痕形成或鼓膜萎缩率、手术时间及一次性置管成功率等临床数据进行分析。结果: 两组在总有效率、术后3个月内脱管率及瘢痕形成或鼓膜萎缩率方面差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);普通法置管组手术时间为(11.4±4.3)min,改良法置管组手术时间为(8.1±3.6)min,普通法置管组一次性置管成功率81.2%,改良法置管组一次性置管成功率93.7%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论: 采用改良法置管能有效缩短手术时间,提高一次性置管成功率,避免因反复操作而导致的鼓膜及外耳道损伤。
- 渗出性中耳炎 /
- 鼓膜置管术 /
- 鼓膜切开吸引刀 /
- 改良置管器
Abstract: Objective: To explore the efficacy of a modified tympanic membrane surgical knife with suction and tube device in myringotomy with ventilation tube placement for the treatment of secretory otitis media.Method: From June of 2014 to December of 2015, 87 cases of secretory otitis media were randomly divided into two groups:One group was treated by general approach to achieve tympanic membrane tube insertion, and another group with modified method. The total effective rate,the rate of tube detachment at 3 months postoperatively, the rate of scar formation or tympanic membrane atrophy, the operation time and the success rate of tube insertion for the first time in two groups were analyzed retrospectively.Result: There was no significantly difference between two groups about the total effective rate,the rate of tube detachment and the rate of scar formation or tympanic membrane atrophy(P>0.05). However, the duration of operation in general method group[(11.4±4.3 min)]was significantly longer than that in modified method group[(8.1±3.6)min](t=5.412,P<0.05). In addition, the success rate of tube insertion in general group(81.2%) was significantly lower than that in modified group(93.7%)(χ²=5.397,P<0.05).Conclusion: The modified method contributed to shorten the duration of operation, improved the success rate of tube insertion and avoided the injury of tympanic membrane and external auditory canal caused by repeated operation.
- exudative otitis media /
- tympanic membrane tube insertion /
- tympanic membrane incision knife /
- modified tube device

HTML全文

参考文献(13)

[1]	张亚梅.儿童分泌性中耳炎的诊断和治疗[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2008, 43 (12):962-965.
[2]	孔维佳, 王斌全, 于德林, 等.耳鼻咽喉科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2002:458-458.
[3]	陈维, 谢洁.鼓膜置管术治疗慢性分泌性中耳炎34例疗效分析[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2007, 21 (7):807-808.
[4]	周永, 唐安洲, 李杰恩, 等.鼓膜置管治疗鼻咽癌放疗后分泌性中耳炎疗效观察[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志, 2005, 19 (1):22-23.
[5]	刘飞, 史保轩.腺样体切除联合置管术治疗儿童分泌性中耳炎临床研究[J].现代预防医学, 2012, 39 (10):2463-2464.
[6]	张亚梅.儿童分泌性中耳炎的诊断和治疗[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2008, 43 (12):962-965.
[7]	KALCIOGLU M T, COKKESERY, KIZILAY A, et al.Follow-up of 366ears after tympanostomy tupe insertion:why is it draining[J].Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2003, 128:560-564.
[8]	JOHNSTON L C, FELDMAN H M, PARADISE J L, et al.Tympanic membraneabnor malities and hearing levels at the aged of 5and 6years in relation to persistent otitis media and tympanostomy tupe insertion in the first 3years of life:aprospective study incorporating a randomized clinical trial[J].Pediatrics, 2004, 114:58-58.
[9]	孙漫漫, 张洋, 秦兆冰.分泌性中耳炎复发的相关因素分析[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2016, 24 (4):343-347.
[10]	冯晓华, 龙孝斌, 汪建, 等.鼓膜置管治疗难治性分泌性中耳炎鼓膜穿孔危险因素分析[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2014 (1):22-26.
[11]	徐志坚, 骆辉珍, 钟晓燕, 等.两种形状中耳硅胶通气管治疗分泌性中耳炎的疗效比较[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2016, 24 (4):393-395.
[12]	钟庄龙, 钟纯, 邱永亮, 等.两种切口置T型管行鼓膜置管术治疗分泌性中耳炎疗效分析[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2013, 27 (13):729-730.
[13]	杨琛, 肖红俊.分泌性中耳炎及鼓室置管治疗的并发症[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2007, 21 (22):1054-1056.