A cross-cultural analysis of musical timbre perception:comparison between Chinese and Western culture
-
摘要: 目的:评价中国和外国听力正常者对音乐音色的辨别能力,分析文化差异与音色感知的相关性,以期为我国人工耳蜗植入者音乐感知的评估及其评估工具的设计开发提供依据。方法:选取成年且音乐经验相匹配的中国听力正常者(CNH)和外国听力正常者(FNH)各40例。应用音乐评估软件(Mu.S.I.C)对受试者进行不同乐器识别能力(包括不同乐器家族的小提琴、小号、双簧管、钢琴、木琴和男高音、女高音共7种音色)和不同乐器数辨别能力(乐器组合选项包括同时演奏1~5种乐器)的测试,记录两项测试的识别正确率。结果:FNH组和CNH组乐器识别正确率分别为(95.58±8.90)%和(89.40±13.13)%(P<0.05),乐器数辨别正确率分别为(80.50±16.32)%和(73.25±21.17)%(P>0.05);CNH组对于双簧管、小号、木琴的平均识别率均低于FNH组;两组受试者均对管乐器中的双簧管和小号识别率较低,且CNH组对双簧管和小号的识别具有较大的混淆率。结论:外国听力正常受试者的音色识别优于中国受试者,文化差异对音乐音色感知存在显著影响。Abstract: Objective:To assess the musical timbre perception ability of normal hearing subjects with different cultural background, and to analyze the correlation between cultural differences and timbre perception.Method:Forty Chinese normal hearing adults(CNH) and 40 normal hearing adults from other countries(FNH) participated in this study.The Mu.S.I.C test was applied for the assessment.The correct rate of musical instrument recognition and numbers of instrument identification of each participant were recorded. Instrument Identification Test was performed with tenor,soprano,and 5 representative musical instruments from different families of musical instruments,and the Instrument Detection Test was performed with mixing sounds of musical instruments.Result:The correct rate of musical instrument recognition in FNH and CNH was (95.58±8.90)% and (89.40±13.13)%(P<0.05), respectively.The correct rate of numbers of instrument detection in FNH and CNH was (80.50±16.32)% and (73.25±21.17)%(P>0.05),respectively. The correct rate of CNH was lower than those of FNH for the trumpet, the oboe and the xylophone. Participants in both 2 groups were more easily failed to recognize the oboe and the trumpet compared the other musical instruments, especially in CNH group.Conclusion:Subjects with Western culture performed better than Chinese subjects on timbre perception. Cultural differences have a significant impact on musical timbre perception.
-
Key words:
- cultural differences /
- timbre perception /
- cochlear implant
-
[1] 张艺.中西方音乐异同初探[J].海南师范大学学报(社会科学版),2012,25(5):142-144.
[2] 韩德民.人工耳蜗[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:18-18.
[3] HENG J,CANTARERO G,ELHILALI M,et al.Impaired perception of temporal fine structure and musical timbre in cochlear implant users[J].Hear Res,2011,280:192-200.
[4] GFELLER K,KNUTSON J F,WOODWORTH G,et al.Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults[J].J Am Acad Audiol,1998,9:1-19.
[5] DRENNAN W R,RUBINSTEIN J T.Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities[J].J Rehabil Res Dev,2008,45:779-789.
[6] 刘子夜,刘博,钟佳利,等.文化差异与音乐感知的相关性分析[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2014,22(4):351-355.
[7] BROCKMEIER S J,FITZGERALD D,SEARLE O,et al.The MuSIC perception test:a novel battery for testing music perception of cochlear implant users[J].Cochlear Implants Int,2011,12:10-20.
[8] GFELLER K,TURNER C,MEHR M,et al.Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults[J].Cochlear Implants Int,2002,3:29-53.
[9] GFELLER K,WITT S,WOODWORTH G,et al.Effects of frequency,instrumental family,and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal[J].Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol,2002,111:349-356.
[10] KANG R,NIMMONS G L,DRENNAN W,et al.Development and validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception test[J].Ear Hear,2009,30:411-418.
[11] 王硕,董瑞娟,李靖,等.语后聋人工耳蜗患者音乐节奏与音色感知能力的评价[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2012,47(6):493-495.
[12] 刘子夜,章昊,刘博,等.成人人工耳蜗植入者音乐旋律和音色感知研究[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2013,11(6):434-437.
[13] 董瑞娟,王硕,周芸,等.音乐评估系统MuSIC的正常值研究[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2013,27(13):712-716.
[14] MEISTER H,LANDWEHR M,LANG-ROTH R,et al.Examination of spectral timbre cues and musical instrument identification in cochlear implant recipients[J].Cochlear Implants Int,2014,15:78-86.
[15] 亓贝尔,刘博.人工耳蜗言语处理方案的研究进展[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2012,26(1):44-47.
[16] GFELLER K,LANSING C R.Melodic,rhythmic,and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users[J].J Speech Hear Res,1991,34:916-920.
计量
- 文章访问数: 70
- PDF下载数: 60
- 施引文献: 0