The analysis of the misdiagnosis big data of the otolaryngology during 2004 to 2013 in China
-
摘要: 目的: 了解我国耳鼻咽喉疾病的临床误诊概况,为减少误诊、提高诊断水平提供参考依据。方法: 利用误诊疾病数据库检索与管理系统对数据库已收录的2004-2013年误诊文献数据中所有耳鼻咽喉疾病文献进行统计学分析,包括文献来源、样本量、误诊率、误诊范围、误诊后果、误诊原因等。结果: 共命中文献369篇,累计误诊病例4 211例。共51种确诊疾病,平均误诊率为25.43%,误诊率最高为鼻咽结核(84.76%)、结核性中耳炎(75.00%)、先天性喉囊肿(75.00%),最低为鼻窦炎(5.92%)。误诊病例数最高的前3位疾病依次为鼻咽喉结核(1 216例)、鼻-鼻窦炎(710例)和良性阵发性位置性眩晕(697例)。对误诊后果的统计显示,97.22%的患者为Ⅲ级误诊后果,即发生误诊误治未造成不良后果,但仍有10例造成Ⅰ级后果(死亡或后遗症)。对文献中误诊原因频次进行统计,居前3位的依次为经验不足缺乏对该病的认识,问诊及体检不细致和未选择针对性检查措施。结论: 10年误诊大数据结果在一定程度上反映了我国耳鼻咽喉疾病的误诊现象,耳鼻咽喉科和神经科、口腔科、呼吸科及眼科医生都应了解容易误诊的耳鼻咽喉疾病的鉴别诊断要点,力求减少临床误诊误治。Abstract: Objective: The aim of this study is to explore the misdiagnosis status of the otolaryngology in China as well as to provide evidence to reduce misdiagnosis and improve the diagnostic level.Method: The retrieval and management system of the misdiagnosed diseases database developed by Chen Xiaohong was used for searching the literature of the misdiagnosis in otolaryngology. The 10 years' misdiagnosis literature data of the otolaryngology(from 2004 to 2013) were analyzed including the literature sources, sample size, misdiagnosis rate, misdiagnosis consequences and misdiagnosis reasons.Result: A total of 369 articles were found, including 4 211 cases. The average misdiagnosis rate was 25.43% in 51 diagnosed diseases. The top misdiagnosed diseases were nasopharyngeal tuberculosis(84.76%), tuberculous otitis media (75%) and congenital laryngeal cyst(75%). The lowest misdiagnosed disease was nasosinusitis(5.92%). The top three misdiagnosed diseases were tuberculosis of otolaryngology(1 216 cases), nasosinusitis(710 cases) and BPPV(697 cases). After statistical analysis, we found that 97.22% of the misdiagnosed patients were gradeⅢconsequences (that is the misdiagnosis and mistreatment does not cause adverse consequences), but there were still 10 cases caused gradeⅠconsequences(death or sequela).The main causes of the misdiagnosis were lack of diagnosis experience, non detailed interrogation and physical examination and non targeted examinations.Conclusion: The big data of the 10 years reflects the misdiagnosis phenomenon in otolaryngology to some extent. Neurologist, stomatologist and ophthalmologist should be familiar to the main points of the differential diagnosis diseases of the otolaryngology and strive to reduce the clinical misdiagnosis and mistreatment.
-
Key words:
- nose diseases /
- ear diseases /
- pharyngeal diseases /
- laryngeal diseases /
- diagnostic errors
-
-
[1] 汪道远.再谈大数据临床研究[J].临床与病理杂志,2014,34(5):469-470.
[2] 宋勇,汪道远.大数据时代临床研究的机遇与挑战[J].医学研究生学报,2014,24(4):337-339.
[3] 刘凤红,崔金钟,韩芳桥,等.数据论文:大数据时代新兴学术论文出版类型探讨[J].中国科技期刊研究,2014,25(12):1451-1456.
[4] 陈晓红.试论误诊研究与混沌理论[J].临床误诊误治,2004,17(4):233-235.
[5] 张新新.新闻出版业大数据应用的思索与展望[J].科技与出版,2016,3:1-4.
[6] 屈宝强,王凯.数据论文的出现与发展[J].图书与情报,2015,5:1-8.
[7] 余亚明,杨发斌,和变枝,等.急慢性鼻窦炎误诊586例临床分析[J].临床医学,2006,26(9):87-88.
[8] 涂明辉,朱小燕.从误诊病例分析基层医院儿童慢性咳嗽的鉴别诊断[J].中国全科医学,2013,16(3c):1062-1062.
[9] 张秀瑜,黄健.非侵袭型真菌性鼻窦炎误诊误治探讨[J].临床误诊误治,2011,24(10):61-64.
[10] 杨道荣.118例良性阵发性位置性眩晕患者误诊分析[J].中国实用神经疾病杂志,2013,16(3):80-81.
[11] 李辉,李继红,周卫东.良性阵发性位置性眩晕误诊20例[J].中国眼耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2013,13(5):325-326.
[12] 张运波,习国平,王毅,等.良性阵发性位置性眩晕50例误漏诊分析[J].临床误诊误治,2015,28(3):50-52.
[13] 李庭毅,彭淑华,胡松,等.良性发作性位置性眩晕67例误诊分析[J].临床误诊误治,2015,28(3):47-50.
[14] 李捷,孙茂东,李欣.临床表现不典型的鼻咽癌误诊原因分析[J].临床误诊误治,2013,26(7):47-48.
[15] 姜锋,胡福军,李斌,等.鼻咽癌的误诊分析及对策[J].中国肿瘤临床,2012,39(24):2026-2035.
[16] 王贵锋,潘金斌.局限型鼻咽癌误诊报道[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2013,20(1):50-50.
[17] 王新,朱耀国,吴继宏.老年鼻咽癌患者32例临床观察[J].中国医药科学,2013,3(14):144-145,153.
[18] 杨宇明,李专,刘彬.喉结核18例误诊分析[J].临床误诊误治,2013,26(4):35-37.
[19] 李长青,王萱,张景华,等.声带结核临床误诊分析[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2013,20(5):266-268.
[20] 张会强,李志海.喉结核的临床特征分析[J].新乡医学院学报,2013,30(5):406-407.
[21] 丁滨.浅析误诊文稿退稿原因[J].临床误诊误治,2016,29(5):封三.
-
计量
- 文章访问数: 482
- PDF下载数: 233
- 施引文献: 0