修改后Berlin量表诊断成人OSAHS的准确性研究

曾进; 古雅兰; 柯嘉; 李丽娟; 药晋红; 马芙蓉

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2014.21.008

修改后Berlin量表诊断成人OSAHS的准确性研究

- 北京大学第三医院耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科(北京, 100191)

详细信息

通讯作者: 马芙蓉,E-mail:furongma@126.com

中图分类号: R563.8

收稿日期: 2014-06-30

Evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of modified Berlin questionnaire on predicting obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome in adults

- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, the Third Hospital of Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China

More Information

Corresponding author: MA Furong, E-mail: furongma@126.com

Received Date: 30 June 2014

摘要

摘要: 目的:评估修改后Berlin量表诊断中国成年人OSAHS的准确性。方法:根据亚太地区肥胖定义,将原Berlin量表的BMI切点值调整至25.0。以244例接受PSG的患者作研究对象,将其填写的原Berlin量表结果和修改后Berlin量表结果分别与PSG结果相比较,评价修改后Berlin量表诊断中国成年人OSAHS的准确性。结果:以AHI≥5为OSAHS的诊断切点值。男性受试者中,原Berlin量表诊断OSAHS的敏感度和特异度分别为74.03%和65.71%,诊断一致性百分率为72.49%,Kappa系数为0.304(P<0.01);修改后Berlin量表对男性受试者的诊断敏感度和特异度分别为92.21%和48.57%,诊断一致性百分率为84.13%,Kappa系数为0.437(P<0.01)。女性受试者中原Berlin量表诊断OSAHS的敏感度和特异度分别为50.00%和61.90%,诊断一致性百分率为54.55%,Kappa系数为0.110(P>0.01);修改后Berlin量表对女性受试者的诊断敏感度和特异度分别为76.47%和47.62%,诊断一致性百分率为65.45%,Kappa系数为0.248(P>0.01)。结论:在男性人群中,修改后Berlin量表较原量表在诊断OSAHS方面具有更好的诊断一致性;在女性人群中,尽管修改后Berlin量表较原量表在诊断一致性上有所提高但仍不理想,尚需进一步探索适合我国女性人群的OSAHS筛查工具。
- 睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征 /
- 阻塞性 /
- Berlin量表 /
- 敏感度 /
- 特异度
Abstract: Objective:To evaluate the diagnostic value of modified Berlin questionnaire on predicting obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome(OSAHS)in Chinese adults. Method:Differ from the original version,BMI cut-off point was adjusted to 25.0 in modified Berlin questionnaire according to the Asia -Pacific obesity definition. A total number of 244 samples who experienced polysomnography (PSG) were included. After well informed,each patient finished questionnaire by an interview. The results of the original and modified questionnaires and polysomnography reports were compared with polysomnography reports to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the modified Berlin questionnaire.Result:In male population, the sensitivity and specificity of original Berlin questionnaire were 74.03% and 65.71%, respectively. The percentage of diagnostic consistency was 72.49%, and Kappa coefficient was 0.304 (P<0.01).In aspect of modified version, the sensitivity and specificity were 92.21% and 48.57%. The percentage of diagnostic consistency was 84.13%, and Kappa coefficient was 0.437 (P<0.01). In female population, the sensitivity and specificity of original version were 50.00% and 61.90%, respectively. The percentage of diagnostic consistency was 54.55%, and Kappa coefficient was 0.110 (P>0.01). When comes to the modified Berlin questionnaire, the sensitivity and specificity were 76.47% and 47.62% in female subjects, and the percentage of consistency agreement was 65.45%, with a Kappa coefficient 0.248 (P>0.01).Conclusion:Compared to the original version, the modified Berlin questionnaire has a better diagnostic consistency with a considerable sensitivity and specificity in male population. However, in female subjects group, the consistency of the modified Berlin questionnaire was still not significant remains unsatisfactory, although P value has been improved. Modified Berlin questionnaire could be used as a primary screening tool for male OSAHS patients. However, but the screening questionnaire for female should still be need to be further explored.
- sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome /
- obstructive /
- Berlin questionnaire /
- sensitivity /
- specificity

HTML全文

参考文献(13)

[1]	张庆, 何权瀛, 杜秋艳, 等.承德市区居民睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征患病率入户调查[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2003, 26 (5):273-275.
[2]	李明娴, 王莹, 华树成, 等.长春市20岁以上人群阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征流行病学现况调查[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2005, 28 (12):833-835.
[3]	上海市医学会呼吸病学分会睡眠呼吸疾病学组.上海市30岁以上人群阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征流行病学调查[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2003, 26 (5):268-272.
[4]	王蓓, 邢景才, 韩长旭, 等.太原市睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征的流行病学调查[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志, 2004, 27 (11):760-762.
[5]	马国强, 代国仪, 李继平, 等.内蒙古东乌旗20岁以上牧区人群阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征流行病学调查[J].中华临床医师杂志 (电子版), 2010, 4 (7):1070-1073.
[6]	World Health Organisation, International Association for the Study of Obesity, International Obesity TaskForce.The Asia-Pacific Perspective:redefining obesity and its treatment[M].Sydney:Health Communications, 2000:17-18.
[7]	中华医学会耳鼻咽喉科学分会中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志编委会.阻塞性睡眼呼吸暂停低通气综合征诊断依据和疗效评定标准及悬雍垂腭咽成形术适应证 (杭州)[J].中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志, 2002, 37 (6):403-404.
[8]	李延忠.睡眠呼吸障碍性疾[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社, 2005:148-152.
[9]	时延伟, 王广发, 张成, 等.Epworth嗜睡量表在阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征筛查中的应用价值[J].中国呼吸与危重监护杂志, 2009, 8 (5):456-460.
[10]	李进让, 陈曦, 孙建军, 等.Epworth嗜睡量表评价阻塞性睡眠呼吸紊乱病情程度的价值[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2007, 42 (4):258-262.
[11]	NIKOLAUS C N, RICCARDO A S, CORDULA M N, et al.Using the Berlin questionnaire to identify patients at risk for the sleep apnea syndrome[J].Ann Int Med, 1999, 131:485-491.
[12]	AHMADI N, CHUNG S A, GIBBS A, et al.The Berlin questionnaire for sleep apnea in a sleep clinic population:relationship to polysomnographic measurement of respiratory disturbance[J].Sleep Breath, 2008, 12:39-45.
[13]	SHARMA S K, VASUDEV C, SINHA S, et al.Validation of the modified Berlin questionnaire to identify patients at risk for the obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome[J].Indian J Med Res, 2006, 124:281-290.