听性脑干诱发反应结合单刺激听觉稳态诱发反应对正常青年人纯音听阈测听相关性研究

李倩庆; 宋江顺; 刘文婷; 汤颖文

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2013.16.010

听性脑干诱发反应结合单刺激听觉稳态诱发反应对正常青年人纯音听阈测听相关性研究

- 1. 广州医学院附属广州市第一人民医院耳鼻咽喉-头颈外科(广州, 510180);
- 2. 广州大学经济与统计学院

详细信息

通讯作者: 宋江顺,E-mail:545950782@qq.com

中图分类号: R764

收稿日期: 2012-11-12

Audiological assessment value of click-evoked auditory brainstem responsecombined with single stimulation of the auditory steady-stateevoked response on normal young people

- 1. Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guangzhou First Municipal People's Hospital Affiliated to Guangzhou Medical College, Guangzhou, 510180, China;
- 2. Guangzhou University, Faculty of Economics and Statistics

More Information

Corresponding author: SONG Jiangshun, E-mail: 545950782@qq.com

Received Date: 12 November 2012

摘要

摘要: 目的:分析正常青年人多刺激听觉稳态诱发反应（m-ASSR）、单刺激ASSR（s-ASSR）、听性脑干诱发反应（C-ABR）、纯音听阈测听（PTA）阈值,分析听力测试组合与PTA之间的相关性,探讨听力测试组合（C-ABR结合0.5、1.0kHz s-ASSR）在听力评估中的价值。方法:对听力正常青年人（43例86耳）分别行PTA、m-ASSR、0.5kHz s-ASSR、1.0kHz s-ASSR、C-ABR检查。将PTA、m-ASSR、听力测试组合（C-ABR结合0.5、1.0kHz s-ASSR反应阈）等用统计学软件SPSSl8.0进行双变量相关分析。结果:各频率m-ASSR、听力测试组合反应阈与PTA之间有较好的相关性。0.5、1.0、2.0、4.0kHz处,听力测试组合反应阈与PTA相关系数分别为0.803、0.650、0.649、0.734,而m-ASSR与PTA相关系数分别为0.48、0.64、0.57、0.64。结论:在正常青年人听力评估中,听力测试组合与PTA之间有较好的相关性,听力测试组合可以更准确、更可靠评估正常青年人听阈水平。
- 听觉稳态诱发反应 /
- 听性脑干诱发反应 /
- 听力测试组合 /
- 纯音听阈测听
Abstract: Objective:Analysis of normal young people multiple stimuli ASSR（m-ASSR）,single stimuli ASSR（s-ASSR）,C-ABR,PTA threshold,exploratory investigation of relevance of hearing test combination thresholds（C-ABR combines with 0.5,1.0 kHz s-ASSR）predict behavioral thresholds,using a within-subjects design.Method:Forty-three normal hearing adults（86 ears） were treated with pure tone audiometry（PTA）,m-ASSR,0.5,1.0 kHz s-ASSR,C-ABR.Data were analyzed by SPSS 18.0 for bivariate correlation analysis.Result:There was significant correlation between thresholds of hearing test combination and PTA,and the correlation coefficient（r）were 0.803,0.650,0.649,0.734 at 0.5,1.0,2.0 and 4.0 kHz;while the correlation coefficient（r） between thresholds of m-ASSR and PTA were 0.48,0.64,0.57,0.64.Conclusion:There is significant correlation between thresholds of hearing test combination and PTA,hearing test combination can be more accurate,more reliable assessment of adults with normal hearing threshold level.
- auditory steady-state response /
- click-evoked auditory brainstem response /
- hearing test combination /
- pure tone audiometry

HTML全文

参考文献(13)

[1]	JIANG Z D,BROSI D M,WILKINSON A R.Brainstem auditory evoked response recorded using maximum length sequences in term neonates[J].Biol Neonate,1999,76:193-199.
[2]	李兴启.几种常用听觉诱发反应测听的比较[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2008,5(4):10-14.
[3]	RABELO C M, SCHOCHAT E. Sensitivity and specificity of auditory steady-state response testing[J]. Clinics (Sao Paulo),2011,66:87-93.
[4]	黄选兆,汪吉宝,孔维佳.实用耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学[M].6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:789-801.
[5]	LINS O G,PICTON T W.Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli[J].Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol,1995,96:420-423.
[6]	PICTON T W, DIMITRIJEVIC A, JOHN M S. Multiple auditory steady-state responses[J].Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl,2002,189:16-21.
[7]	员根远,贺德生,陈蕊玲,等.正常青年人多频稳态反应阈值的测试[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2007,15(1):70-71.
[8]	PICTON T W, VAN R P, JOHN M S. Multiple auditory steady state responses (80~101 Hz):effects of ear, gender, handedness, intensity and modulation rate[J]. Ear Hear,2009,30:100-103.
[9]	钟志茹,陶征,邹建华.多频稳态诱发电位单频刺激与多频刺激测试结果的观察比较[J].中国听力语言康复科学杂志,2004,2(6):33-34.
[10]	JOHN M S, LINS O G, BOUCHER B L, et al. Multiple auditory steady-state responses (MASTER):stimulus and recording parameters[J]. Audiology,1998,37:59-82.
[11]	LIN Y H, HO H C, WU H P.Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss[J].Auris Nasus Larynx,2009,36:140-145.
[12]	吴医婕,吴皓,李蕴,等.ASSR、Tb-ABR和c-ABR在正常听力人群客观听阈评估中的相关性分析[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2009,23(1):4-7.
[13]	DIMIT R A, JOHN M S, VAN R P, et al. Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses[J].J Am Acad Audiol, 2002, 13:205-224.