-
摘要: 目的:比较分析不同年龄段听力障碍患者助听器佩戴效果及满意度。方法:按年龄将90例听力障碍患者分为3组,19~40岁为A组,41~60岁为B组,61~80岁为C组;分别于助听器佩戴后6周、6个月、12个月评估其助听效果及满意度。结果:助听器每日生活使用满意度调查问卷评分,积极作用、服务与花费以及个人形象A组得分均高于B组和C组,B组得分均高于C组(P<0.01);负面作用A组得分均低于B组和C组,B组得分均低于C组(P<0.01)。助听器效果国际性调查问卷评分,A组得分均高于B组和C组,B组得分均高于C组(P<0.01)。结论:随佩戴时间的延长各年龄段人群助听器佩戴效果及满意度都是逐渐增加的,但随年龄的增长佩戴效果及满意度是逐渐降低的。Abstract: Objective: To compare and analysis outcomes of different age paragraph hearing aid users by questionnaires.Method: The questionnaire was deployed to 90 hearing aid users,40 females and 50 males, with ages between 19 and 80 years-from junior high school education to university education, suffering binaural severe or moderate sensorineural deafness. The subjects were devided into 3 groups,the A group with ages between 19 and 40 years , the B group with ages between 41 and 60 years, the C group with ages between 61and 80 years. After being fitted with hearing aids for 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months, SADL and IOI-HA were applied to evaluating 90 subjects. The study was carried out through face to face interview or by telephone.Result: There were significant differences in SADL scores of positive effect , service and Personal image among the 3 groups(P<0.01).The scores of the A group was the highest ,and the B group was higher than the C group. On the contrary, there were significant differences in SADL scores of negative effect among the 3 groups(P<0.01),with the scores of the A group being the lowest,and the B group being lower than the C group. There were also significant differences in IOI-HA scores among the 3 groups(P<0.01).The scores of the A group was the highest,and the B group was higher than the C group.Conclusion: The outcome and satisfaction of hearing aids among different age paragraph is improved with the wearing time growth, but the outcome and satisfaction of hearing aids are decreased with the age growth.
-
Key words:
- different age paragraph /
- questionnaire /
- hearing aids outcome measurement
-
-
[1] 张华.助听器效果测定[M]//张华.助听器.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:199-208.
[2] 张华,汪若峰.助听效果测定的进展[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2002,10(1):47-49.
[3] DILLON H,JAMES A.GINIS J. Client Oriented Scaleof Improvement(COSI)its relationship to severalother measures of benefit and satisfaction provided byhearing aids[J].J Am Acad Audio,1997,8:27-43.
[4] COX R M,ALEXANDER G C. Measuring satisfaction with amplification in Daily Life:the SADL sale[J].Ear Hear,1999,20:306-308.
[5] COX R M, STEPHENS D,KRAMER S E. Translations of the international outcome inventory for hearing aids(IOI-HA)[J].Int J Audiol,2002,41:3-4.
[6] 孔颖,张华,李靖,等.助听器效果国际性调查问卷在助听器效果评估中的应用[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2010,18(6):591-594.
[7] 李玉玲,张华,陈雪清,等.老年人助听器配戴效果的问卷评估[J].听力及言语疾病杂,2011,19(1):70-72.
[8] 任艳峰,曲成毅,苗茂华.老年人认知功能影响因素的研究[J].现代预防学,2007,34(16):3088-3091.
[9] 王宁宇.听力减退与认知障碍[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2006,41(10):797-800.
[10] 陈向红,周慧芳,张静,等.老年性聋助听器选配效果评估问卷的应用[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志2011,25(4):148-151.
-
计量
- 文章访问数: 345
- PDF下载数: 116
- 施引文献: 0
下载: