微创人工耳蜗术中耳蜗电图监测用于残余听力保留的临床研究

王睿婕, 罗建芬, 戴清蕾, 等. 微创人工耳蜗术中耳蜗电图监测用于残余听力保留的临床研究[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2025, 39(5): 425-432. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2025.05.006
引用本文: 王睿婕, 罗建芬, 戴清蕾, 等. 微创人工耳蜗术中耳蜗电图监测用于残余听力保留的临床研究[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2025, 39(5): 425-432. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2025.05.006
WANG Ruijie, LUO Jianfen, DAI Qinglei, et al. A clinical study of electrocochleography monitoring for residual hearing retention during minimally invasive cochlear implant[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2025, 39(5): 425-432. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2025.05.006
Citation: WANG Ruijie, LUO Jianfen, DAI Qinglei, et al. A clinical study of electrocochleography monitoring for residual hearing retention during minimally invasive cochlear implant[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2025, 39(5): 425-432. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2025.05.006

微创人工耳蜗术中耳蜗电图监测用于残余听力保留的临床研究

  • 基金项目:
    国家重点研发计划(子课题)(No:2022YFC2703602);国家自然科学基金(No:82271172、82071053);山东省自然科学基金重点基础研究计划(No:ZR2021ZD40);山东省泰山学者工程-青年专家计划(No:tsqn202211357);山东省医药卫生科技重点项目(No:202307010345);山东大学横向课题(No:6010420001)
详细信息
    通讯作者: 徐磊,E-mail:sdphxl@126.com
  • 中图分类号: R764.35

A clinical study of electrocochleography monitoring for residual hearing retention during minimally invasive cochlear implant

More Information
  • 目的 探讨微创人工耳蜗植入(cochlear implant,CI)术中耳蜗电图(electrocochleography,ECochG)实时监测技术指导电极植入的应用价值,分析术中波形变化及植入方式与患者术后残余听力(residual hearing,RH)保留效果的相关性。方法 本研究纳入2022年6月至2024年7月进行CI手术的31例患者(共35耳)。术中均采用动态植入监测(active insertion monitoring,AIM)系统进行电极植入过程中的ECochG实时监测。记录术中耳蜗微音电位(cochlear microphonic,CM)波形变化,分析其与患者术后RH保留的相关性。结果 ① 所有35耳中成功记录到术中CM反应的有34耳(97.1%)。②根据Harris分型,A型(上升型)有7耳(20.6%)、C型(下降型)7耳(20.6%)、CC型(波动型)8耳(23.5%)、D型(无反应型)12耳(35.3%)。③CM幅值下降总量与术后低中频听力下降呈显著中度正相关(r=0.67,P=0.017)与术后低频听力下降呈显著中度正相关(r=0.65,P=0.023)。④平均幅值变化中,Amax为30.70 μV、Amin为8.64 μV、Aend为18.27 μV。⑤其中16耳进行了术后短期听力随访,低中频(125~1 000 Hz)听力损失为15.25 dB HL,RH保留率为87.5%。结论 微创CI植入术中ECochG实时监测技术可有效指导手术医生进行微创电极植入,术中CM波形变化可预估术后短期内的听力变化,ECochG术中监测有助于提高患者的RH保留效果。
  • 加载中
  • 图 1  34耳术中ECochG监测波形图

    图 2  术中监测结果举例(患者7)

    图 3  低中频及低频裸耳听阈变化值与术中CM幅值下降(对数转换为dB)的函数

    图 4  比较上升型/波动型组与下降型组其术前、术后裸耳听力的变化

    图 5  确认穿阶的患者其术中EFI电极矩阵(A)与术后6 min EFI(B)矩阵比较

    表 1  31例(35耳)受试者基本信息

    序号 性别 植入年龄/岁 病因 影像学 植入侧别 手术入路 植入电极
    1 F 4 先天性 M,E L 圆窗 Advantage MS
    2 F 4 先天性 M,E R 扩大圆窗 Advantage MS
    3 M 42 不明原因 正常 L 圆窗 Advantage MS
    4 F 50 不明原因 M,E R 圆窗 Ultra MS
    5 F 15 不明原因 正常 L 圆窗 Ultra MS
    6 F 31 先天性 M,E L 圆窗 Ultra SlimJ
    7 F 23 先天性 M,E R 圆窗 Ultra SlimJ
    8 F 43 突发性 正常 R 圆窗 Ultra MS
    9 F 35 不明原因 正常 L 圆窗 Ultra MS
    10 F 48 不明原因 正常 R 圆窗 Ultra MS
    11 M 41 不明原因 正常 L 圆窗 Ultra SlimJ
    12 M 64 外伤 正常 R 圆窗 Ultra SlimJ
    13 M 36 先天性 正常 L 圆窗 Ultra MS
    14 M 34 药物性 正常 L 圆窗 Ultra MS
    15 M 7 先天性 M,E L 圆窗 Ultra SlimJ
    16 F 23 不明原因 正常 R 圆窗 Ultra SlimJ
    17 F 8 先天性 M,E L 圆窗 Ultra MS
    18 M 23 先天性 正常 L 圆窗 Ultra SlimJ
    19 M 23 先天性 正常 R 圆窗 Ultra SlimJ
    20 M 60 不明原因 正常 R 圆窗 Ultra SlimJ
    21 M 25 先天性 正常 L 圆窗 Ultra SlimJ
    22 M 27 不明原因 正常 L 圆窗 Ultra SlimJ
    23 F 45 药物性 正常 R 圆窗 Ultra MS
    24 F 63 不明原因 正常 L 圆窗 Ultra MS
    25 M 46 发热 正常 L 圆窗 Ultra MS
    26 F 7 中耳炎 M,E L 圆窗 Ultra MS
    27 F 30 不明原因 正常 L 扩大圆窗 Ultra MS
    28 F 30 不明原因 正常 R 扩大圆窗 Ultra MS
    29 M 7 先天性 M,E L 扩大圆窗 Ultra SlimJ
    30 M 5 先天性 M,E R 扩大圆窗 Ultra MS
    31 F 1 先天性 M,E L 扩大圆窗 Ultra MS
    32 F 1 先天性 M,E R 扩大圆窗 Ultra MS
    33 M 10 不明原因 正常 L 圆窗 Ultra MS
    34 M 40 先天性 正常 R 扩大圆窗 Ultra MS
    35 M 44 不明原因 正常 R 扩大圆窗 Ultra MS
    M:男,F:女;L:左侧,R:右侧;M:Mondini畸形,E:前庭导水管扩大。
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1]

    Gantz BJ, Hansen M, Dunn CC. Clinical perspective on hearing preservation in cochlear implantation, the University of Iowa experience[J]. Hear Res, 2022, 426: 108487. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108487

    [2]

    王睿婕, 罗建芬, 晁秀华, 等. 低频残余听力保留患者声电联合刺激短期效果观察[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2023, 58(12): 1173-1182.

    [3]

    Tsukada K, Usami SI. Vestibular preservation after cochlear implantation using the round window approach[J]. Front Neurol, 2021, 12: 656592. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.656592

    [4]

    Sosna-Duranowska M, Tacikowska G, Gos E, et al. Vestibular function after cochlear implantation in partial deafness treatment[J]. Front Neurol, 2021, 12: 667055. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.667055

    [5]

    Wang RJ, Xu KF, Luo JF, et al. Vestibular function and hearing preservation in children following a minimally invasive cochlear implantation[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2024, 281(8): 4029-4038. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08504-4

    [6]

    Ketterer MC, Shiraliyev K, Arndt S, et al. Implantation and reimplantation: epidemiology, etiology and pathogenesis over the last 30 years[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2024, 281(8): 4095-4102.

    [7]

    邹馨悦, 陈彪, 李永新. 双侧人工耳蜗植入现状及研究进展[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2024, 38(7): 666-670. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2024.07.021

    [8]

    鲁兆毅, 潘滔, 王宇, 等. 32例儿童人工耳蜗再植入的术中问题及应对措施[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2023, 37(3): 218-221. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.03.012

    [9]

    Zhang L, Chen S, Sun Y. Mechanism and prevention of spiral ganglion neuron degeneration in the cochlea[J]. Front Cell Neurosci, 2021, 15: 814891.

    [10]

    Xiang JL, Jin Y, Song NN, et al. Comprehensive genetic testing improves the clinical diagnosis and medical management of pediatric patients with isolated hearing loss[J]. BMC Med Genomics, 2022, 15(1): 142. doi: 10.1186/s12920-022-01293-x

    [11]

    Bai X, Chen S, Xu K, et al. N-acetylcysteine combined with dexamethasone treatment improves sudden sensorineural hearing loss and attenuates hair cell death caused by ROS stress[J]. Front Cell Dev Biol, 2021, 9: 659486. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.659486

    [12]

    Xu K, Chen S, Xie L, et al. The protective effects of systemic dexamethasone on sensory epithelial damage and hearing loss in targeted Cx26-null mice[J]. Cell Death Dis, 2022, 13(6): 545. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-04987-3

    [13]

    Bourn S, Goldstein MR, Jacob A. Hearing preservation in elderly cochlear implant recipients[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2020, 41(5): 618-624. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002596

    [14]

    Schaefer S, Sahwan M, Metryka A, et al. The benefits of preserving residual hearing following cochlear implantation: a systematic review[J]. Int J Audiol, 2021, 60(8): 561-577. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1863484

    [15]

    Trecca EMC, Riggs WJ, Mattingly JK, et al. Electrocochleography and Cochlear Implantation: A Systematic Review[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2020, 41(7): 864-878. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002694

    [16]

    Schuerch K, Wimmer W, Dalbert A, et al. Objectification of intracochlear electrocochleography using machine learning[J]. Front Neurol, 2022, 13: 943816. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.943816

    [17]

    O'Leary S, Mylanus E, Venail F, et al. Monitoring cochlear health with intracochlear electrocochleography during cochlear implantation: findings from an international clinical investigation[J]. Ear Hear, 2023, 44(2): 358-370. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001288

    [18]

    Lenarz T, Buechner A, Gantz B, et al. Relationship between intraoperative electrocochleography and hearing preservation[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2022, 43(1): e72-e78. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003403

    [19]

    Harris MS, Koka K, Riggs WJ, et al. Can electrocochleography help preserve hearing after cochlear implantation with full electrode insertion?[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2022, 43(7): 789-796. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003588

    [20]

    Valenzuela CV, Lichtenhan JT, Lefler SM, et al. Intracochlear electrocochleography and speech perception scores in cochlear implant recipients[J]. Laryngoscope, 2021, 131(10): E2681-E2688.

    [21]

    Dietz A, Linder P, Iso-Mustajärvi M. A state-of-the-art method for preserving residual hearing during cochlear implant surgery[J]. J Vis Exp, 2023(195): e64021.

    [22]

    Buechner A, Bardt M, Haumann S, et al. Clinical experiences with intraoperative electrocochleography in cochlear implant recipients and its potential to reduce insertion trauma and improve postoperative hearing preservation[J]. PLoS One, 2022, 17(4): e0266077. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266077

    [23]

    Skarzynski H, van de Heyning P, Agrawal S, et al. Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system[J]. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl, 2013(564): 3-13.

    [24]

    Harris MS, Koka K, Thompson-Harvey A, et al. Amplitude parameters are predictive of hearing preservation in a randomized controlled trial of intracochlear electrocochleography during cochlear implant surgery[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2024, 45(8): 887-894.

    [25]

    Yin LX, Barnes JH, Saoji AA, et al. Clinical utility of intraoperative electrocochleography(ECochG)during cochlear implantation: a systematic review and quantitative analysis[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2021, 42(3): 363-371.

    [26]

    Haumann S, Timm ME, Büchner A, et al. Intracochlear recording of electrocochleography during and after cochlear implant insertion dependent on the location in the cochlea[J]. Trends Hear, 2024, 28: 23312165241248973.

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  179
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2024-10-07
修回日期:  2025-02-21
刊出日期:  2025-05-03

返回顶部

目录