The effect of surgical resection on the treatment of idiopathic laryngeal contact granuloma
-
摘要: 目的 探讨特发性喉接触性肉芽肿手术治疗史对其后续治疗的效果影响。方法 对2014年4月—2019年12月就诊于解放军总医院第六医学中心耳鼻咽喉头颈外科门诊，自愿选择经甲状舌骨膜病变内注射糖皮质激素联合口服奥美拉唑治疗的390例特发性喉接触性肉芽肿男性患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析，根据在接受联合疗法前，是否曾接受喉接触性肉芽肿显微切除术将患者分为有手术史组(172例)和无手术史组(218例)，之后均接受联合疗法，比较两组的疗效和治愈时间。结果 截止联合治疗后第6个月时，有手术史组联合疗法的总有效率为71.5%(123/172)，无手术史组总有效率为97.7%(213/218)，两组差异有统计学意义(Z=-7.828，P=0.0001)，并且无手术史组患者的平均治愈时间较有手术史组明显缩短(Z=-4.441，P=0.0001)。结论 因喉接触性肉芽肿的手术治疗增加了后续治疗的难度，因此不建议对初诊的喉接触性肉芽肿患者采取手术治疗。Abstract: Objective The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of surgical resection of idiopathic laryngeal contact granuloma on the follow-up treatment.Methods From April 2014 to December 2019, the clinical data of 390 male patients with idiopathic laryngeal granuloma treated were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into the group with history of surgical resection (172 patients) and the group without surgical resection history (218 patients), and then both received the combined therapy. The treatment efficacy of the two groups were compared.Results By the end of 6 months after beginning the combined therapy, the total efficacy rate of the patients with a history of surgery was 71.5%(123/172), and that in patients without a history of surgery was 97.7% (213/218). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant(Z=-7.828, P=0.0001). Among the cured patients, the cure time of patients without the surgery history was shorter than patients with surgery history(Z=-4.441, P=0.0001).Conclusion Surgical treatment of laryngeal contact granuloma increases the difficulty of follow-up treatment, so surgical treatment is not recommended for newly diagnosed patients with laryngeal contact granuloma.
-
Key words:
- laryngeal contact granuloma /
- glucocorticoid /
- proton pump inhibitor
-
-
[1] 程磊, 黎长江, 吴海涛. 喉接触性肉芽肿的病因分析及非手术治疗的疗效分析[J]. 中国中西医结合耳鼻咽喉科杂志, 2016, 24(5): 357-359. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYJH201605009.htm
[2] 张建辉, 唐嗣泉, 唐一萍. 喉接触性肉芽肿临床分析及治疗方法探讨[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2014, 28(6): 416-418. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCEH201406018.htm
[3] 田师宇. 喉接触性肉芽肿的治疗现状[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2017, 31(15): 1217-1220. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCEH201715022.htm
[4] 田师宇, 李进让, 郭鹏飞, 等. 病变内激素注射结合抑酸疗法治疗喉接触性肉芽肿的疗效分析[J]. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2016, 51(2): 90-94. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YYXK201804090.htm
[5] Lee SW, Hong HJ, Choi SH, et al. Comparison of treatment modalities for contact granuloma: a nationwide multicenter study[J]. Laryngoscope, 2014, 124(5): 1187-1191. doi: 10.1002/lary.24470
[6] Chang W, Xu W, Cheng L. Treatment of Laryngeal Contact Granuloma: Surgical Therapy or Conservative Treatment[J]. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec, 2019, 81(5-6): 348/353. doi: 10.1159/000503975
[7] Carroll TL, Gartner-Schmidt J, Statham MM, et al. Vocal process granuloma and glottal insufficiency: an overlooked etiology?[J]. Laryngoscope, 2010, 120(1): 114-120. doi: 10.1002/lary.20656
[8] Benjamin B, Croxson G. Vocal cord granulomas[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 1985, 94(6 Pt 1): 538-541.
[9] 田师宇, 李进让, 李可亮, 等. 经甲状舌骨膜声带注射糖皮质激素治疗喉接触性肉芽肿[J]. 听力学及言语疾病杂志, 2017, 25(1): 70-72. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TLXJ201701019.htm
[10] 华杜鹃, 屈季宁, 周涛. 反流症状指数量表和反流体征指数量表在喉咽反流性疾病诊断中的应用研究[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2013, 20(3): 144-146. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-EBYT201303015.htm
[11] Batioglu-Karaaltin A, Develioglu O, Akiner U, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux: Use of empirical lansoprazole[J]. Ear Nose Throat J, 2018, 97(12): E1-E6.
[12] Tsai SW, Ma YF, Shih LC, et al. Operative and Conservative Management of Laryngeal Contact Granuloma: A Network Analysis and Systematic Review[J]. J Voice, 2021, 35(2): 300-306. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.08.019
[13] Duan HG, Jin HJ, Zheng CQ. Surgery and proton pump inhibitors for treatment of vocal process granulomas[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2013, 270(11): 2921-2926. doi: 10.1007/s00405-013-2527-8
[14] 柯朝阳, 罗树青, 刘明, 等. 18例喉接触性肉芽肿的临床病理分析[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2007, 21(12): 545-547. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCEH200712006.htm
[15] Li J, Tian S, Zou S, et al. CT Study of the Arytenoid Cartilage in Patients with Laryngeal Contact Granuloma[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2017, 157(6): 1013-1016. doi: 10.1177/0194599817721153
[16] Delahunty JE, Cherry J. Experimentally produced vocal cord granulomas[J]. Laryngoscope, 1968, 78(11): 1941-1947. doi: 10.1288/00005537-196811000-00008
[17] Koufman JA, Amin MR, Panetti M. Prevalence of reflux in 113 consecutive patients with laryngeal and voice disorders[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2000, 123(4): 385-388. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2000.109935
[18] 侯丽珍, 徐文, 韩德民. 喉接触性肉芽肿的临床特点[J]. 中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科, 2009, 16(9): 517-520. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-EBYT200909022.htm
[19] Wang CT, Lai MS, Lo WC, et al. Intralesional steroid injection: an alternative treatment option for vocal process granuloma in ten patients[J]. Clin Otolaryngol, 2013, 38(1): 77-81.
[20] Ylitalo R, Ramel S. Extraesophageal reflux in patients with contact granuloma: a prospective controlled study[J]. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2002, 111(5 Pt 1): 441-446.
[21] 聂倩, 李进让, 张冉, 等. 咽喉反流与男性特发性喉接触性肉芽肿杓状软骨钙化的关系[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2020, 34(3): 263-265. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCEH202003020.htm
[22] Ma L, Xiao Y, Ye J, et al. Analysis of therapeutic methods for treating vocal process granulomas[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2015, 135(3): 277-282.
[23] Devaney KO, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A. Vocal process granuloma of the larynx-recognition, differential diagnosis and treatment[J]. Oral Oncol, 2005, 41(7): 666-669.
-
下载:
图(2)
计量
- 文章访问数: 1284
- PDF下载数: 409
- 施引文献: 0