七项咽鼓管功能障碍症状评分量表的临床应用

曹亚茹; 张瑾; 刘晖; 张文

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2018.19.010

七项咽鼓管功能障碍症状评分量表的临床应用

- 1. 西安医学院(西安, 710068);
- 2. 陕西省人民医院耳鼻咽喉头颈外科
基金项目:
陕西省重点研发计划重点项目 (No:2018ZDXM-SF-048)

详细信息

通讯作者: 张文, E-mail:smileww@foxmail.com

中图分类号: R764.29

收稿日期: 2018-07-27

Clinical application of seven-item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire

- 1 Xi'an Medical University, Xi'an, 710068, China;
- 2 Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital

More Information

Corresponding author: ZHANG Wen, E-mail: smileww@foxmail.com

Received Date: 27 July 2018

摘要

摘要: 目的: 探讨七项咽鼓管功能障碍症状评分量表(ETDQ-7)评估咽鼓管功能障碍治疗前后的临床价值。方法: 前瞻性分析咽鼓管功能障碍患者50例,所有患者均于鼻内镜下咽鼓管吹张给予注射用糜蛋白酶4 000 IU和地塞米松注射液5 mg,1次/d,连续使用3~6 d,同时应用盐酸氮卓斯汀鼻喷剂和布地奈德鼻喷剂,2喷/次,2次/d;口服欧龙马滴剂,3 ml/次,3次/d。患者于治疗前及治疗结束后分别填写ETDQ-7。结合患者耳内镜检查、纯音听阈测试、声导抗测试、咽鼓管压力测定等结果综合评定疗效。结果: 治疗后ETDQ-7评分为(15.6±7.1)分,显著高于治疗前(23.1±6.5)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。所有患者治疗后自觉耳闷胀感、耳鸣或不适感、听力下降等症状较前缓解,观察鼓膜像情况较治疗前改善,鼓室积液、鼓膜内陷等程度较前减轻,与ETDQ-7评分基本一致。结论: ETDQ-7在评估咽鼓管功能障碍治疗前后具有较好的临床价值,是一种可重复且有效的评估咽鼓管功能障碍的方法。
- 咽鼓管功能障碍 /
- 症状 /
- 评分
Abstract: Objective: To investigate the clinical value of the seven-item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire(ETDQ-7) in evaluating Eustachian tube dysfunction before and after treatment. Method: A retrospective analysis of 50 patients with Eustachian tube dysfunction diagnosed. All the patients were given chymotrypsin 4 000 IU and dexamethasone injection 5 mg by blowing through the Eustachian tube under nasal endoscopic guidance once daily for 3-6 consecutive days. At the same time, azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray and budesonide nasal spray were applied, 2 sprays each time, 2 times a day; oral Olongma drops, 3 ml each time, 3 times a day. ETDQ-7 was completed before and after treatment, and the results of ear endoscopy, pure tone audiometry, acoustic impedance test, and Eustachian tube function test were analyzed comprehensively. Result: The ETDQ-7 score(15.6±7.1) after treatment was significantly higher than that before treatment(23.1±6.5) points (P<0.05), and the difference was statistically significant. After treatment, all patients felt that aural fullness, tinnitus or discomfort, hearing loss and other symptoms were relieved. The tympanic membrane was observed to be better than before treatment. The tympanic effusion and tympanic membrane invagination were improved, which was in line with the change of ETDQ-7 score. Conclusion: ETDQ-7 has a good clinical value in the evaluation of Eustachian tube dysfunction before and after treatment. It is a reproducible and effective method for evaluating Eustachian tube dysfunction(ETD).
- eustachian tube dysfunction /
- symptoms /
- grading

HTML全文

参考文献(9)

[1]	SCHILDER A G, BHUTTA M F, BUTLER C C, et al.Eustachian tube dysfunction:consensus statement on definition, types, clinical presentation and diagnosis[J].Clin Otolaryngol, 2015, 40:407-411.
[2]	杨海弟, 区永康, 郑亿庆.内陷袋胆脂瘤形成的机制及临床意义[J].中华耳科学杂志, 2004, 2 (4):46-49.
[3]	MCCOUL E D, ANAND V K, CHRISTOS P J.Validating the clinical assessment of eustachian tube dysfunction:The Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ-7)[J].Laryngoscope, 2012, 122:1137-1141.
[4]	陈彬, 高下, 俞晨杰, 等.七项咽鼓管功能障碍症状评分量表的应用分析[J].中华耳科杂志, 2016, 14 (3):403-406.
[5]	SCHRODER S, LEHMANN M, SUDHOFF H, et al.Assessment of chronic obstructive eustachian tube dysfunction:Evaluation of the German version of the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire[J].HNO, 2014, 62:160-164.
[6]	VAN ROEYEN S, VAN DE HEYNING P, VANROMPAEY V.Value and discriminative power of the seven-item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire[J].Laryngoscope, 2015, 125:2553-2556.
[7]	VAN ROEYEN S, VAN DE HEYNING P, VANROMPAEY V.Responsiveness of the 7-item Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire[J].J Int Adv Otol, 2016, 12:106-108.
[8]	秦欢, 杨军.咽鼓管球囊扩张成形术联合鼓膜置管治疗慢性延迟开放型咽鼓管功能不良的疗效分析[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2018, 32 (6):465-469.
[9]	张家鹏, 郭艺莲, 卢标清, 等.咽鼓管球囊扩张联合鼓膜切开置管术治疗复发性分泌性中耳炎的应用分析[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2018, 32 (7):551-553.