各年龄段全聋型特发性突聋的临床分析

敖敏; 戚星; 邓洁; 徐刚; 唐兴华; 何刚

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2016.12.002

各年龄段全聋型特发性突聋的临床分析

- 四川省人民医院四川省医学科学院耳鼻咽喉科(成都, 610072)

详细信息

通讯作者: 敖敏,E-mail:aominaominokok@163.com

中图分类号: R764.43

收稿日期: 2016-02-28

Outcomes of total deafness type of idiopathic sudden deafness in different ages

- Department of Otolaryngology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu, 610072, China

More Information

Corresponding author: AO Min, E-mail: aominaominokok@163.com

Received Date: 28 February 2016

摘要

摘要: 目的: 研究各年龄段全聋型特发性突聋的临床预后。方法: 179例全聋型特发性突聋患者,根据年龄将患者分为5组,即儿童组(≤ 13岁)、青年组(14~44岁)、中年组(45~59岁)、老年前期组(60~74岁)、老年组(≥ 75岁)。根据初始听力损失程度分为3组:81 dB组(81~89 dBHL)、90 dB组(90~99 dBHL)、100 dB组(≥ 100 dBHL)。常规综合治疗方法包括糖皮质激素、改善内耳微循环类药物、神经营养药物、饱和氧及高压氧治疗等,根据年龄及体重用药。结果: 青年组患者(83/179,46.4%)最多(P<0.05),其次为中年组(57/179,31.8%)(P<0.05),再次为老年前期组(26/179,14.5%)(P<0.05),儿童组(8/179,4.5%)与老年组患者(5/179,2.8%)最少。全聋型患者中儿童组和老年组无痊愈者,其余组痊愈者均少。各年龄组全聋型突聋疗效差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。全聋型突聋中,100 dB组患者最多(108/179,60.3%)(P<0.05),81 dB组(39/179,21.8%)与90 dB组(32/179,17.9%)患者比例相近(P>0.05)。81 dB组突聋疗效(25/39,64.1%)与90 dB组(18/32,56.2%)相近(P>0.05),81 dB组与90 dB组疗效均优于100 dB组(24/108,22.2%)(P<0.05),100 dB组的疗效降低了全聋型突聋的疗效。伴眩晕(95/179,53.1%)与不伴眩晕者(84/179,46.9%)比例相近(P>0.05),不伴眩晕者突聋疗效(43/84,51.2%)优于伴眩晕者(24/95, 25.3%)(P<0.05)。81 dB组不伴眩晕者(31/39,79.5%)最多(P<0.05),90 dB组(18/32,56.2%)次之(P<0.05),100 dB组伴眩晕者最多(73/108,67.6%)(P<0.05)。81 dB组(21/31,67.7%)与90 dB组不伴眩晕者(11/18,61.1%)突聋疗效相近(P>0.05),均优于100 dB组不伴眩晕者(11/35,31.4%)疗效(P<0.05)。结论: 100 dB组伴眩晕者最多,将全聋型突聋患者以100 dB为分界,可获得预测显效率、愈合率、总有效率高低的重要预后信息。
- 听觉丧失 /
- 突发性 /
- 儿童 /
- 青年 /
- 中年人 /
- 老年人
Abstract: Objective: This retrospective study was aimed to investigate the characteristics of hearing recovery in the complete deafness type of SSNHL(≥ 81 dBHL) in patients with different ages.Method: Clinical outcomes of 179 total deafness type of idiopathic sudden deafness were compared.Patients were divided into 5 groups according to age, they were, pediatric group(13 years or less), youthful group(14-44 years), middle-aged group(45-59 years), presenium group(60-74 years), senectitude group(75 years or higher).Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the initial degree of hearing loss:81 dB group (81-89 dBHL), 90 dB group(90- 99 dBHL), 100 dB group(100 dBHL or higher).Routine comprehensive treatment including corticosteroids, the inner ear microcirculation improvement drugs, neurotrophic drugs, saturationoxygen and hyperbaric oxygen therapy, etc. was applied. Patients were treated in accordance with the age and body weight.Result: The percentage of youthful group(83/179,46.4%) was highest(P<0.05),middle-aged group (57/179,31.8%)followed(P<0.05),presenium group (26/179,14.5%)was lower(P<0.05), pediatric group(8/179,4.5%) and senectitude group (5/179,2.8%)were the lowest. No a complete recovery in either pediatric group or senectitude group. A complete recovery was rare in the other groups. Recovery rate of the different aged groups was similar(P>0.05).The percentage of 100 dB group(108/179,60.3%) was highest(P<0.05).The percentage of 81 dB group (39/179,21.8%)was similar to 90 dB group(32/179,17.9%)(P>0.05).Recovery rate was similar in 81 dB group (25/39,64.1%)and 90 dB group(18/32,56.2%)(P>0.05).Recovery rate of both 81 dB group and 90 dB group were greater than 100 dB group(24/108,22.2%)(P<0.05). The 100 dB group reduced the satisfactory recovery effects. There were no differences in the proportion of the patients with dizziness (95/179,53.1%)and without dizziness(84/179,46.9%)(P>0.05).Recovery rate of patients without dizziness (43/84,51.2%) was greater than with dizziness(24/95, 25.3%)(P<0.05).The percentage of the patients without dizziness(31/39,79.5%)in 81 dB group was the highest(P<0.05),90 dB group(18/32,56.2%)followed(P<0.05).The percentage of the patients with dizziness in 100 dB group (73/108,67.6%)was highest(P<0.05).Recovery rate was similar in the patients without dizziness of 81 dB group (21/31,67.7%)and 90 dB group(11/18,61.1%)(P>0.05).Recovery rate of the above two groups was greater than that of 100 dB group(11/35,31.4%)(P<0.05).Conclusion: Recovery rate of the different aged groups was similar. The percentage of the patients with dizziness in 100 dB group was highest.Initial hearing threshold in excess of 100 dB reduced the satisfactory recovery in patients with total deafness type of SSNHL. Our results provided a good reference for other clinicians.
- hearing loss /
- sudden /
- child /
- youth /
- middle aged /
- aged

HTML全文

参考文献(13)

[1]	中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会,中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会.突发性聋的诊断和治疗指南(2015)[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2015,50(6):443-447.
[2]	NA S Y,KIM M G,HONG S M,et al.Comparison of sudden deafness in adults and children[J].Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol,2014,7:165-169.
[3]	JO S Y,LEE S,EOM T H,et al.outcomes of severe to profound idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss[J].Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol,2015,8:206-210.
[4]	陈成芳,王明明,樊兆民,等.血脂与突发性聋发病及疗效的相关分析[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2015,50(10):793-798.
[5]	中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会,中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会.突发性聋的诊断和治疗指南(2005年,济南)[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2006,41(8):569-569.
[6]	ZADEH M H,STORPER I S,SPITZER J B.Diagnosis and treatment of sudden-onset sensorineural hearing loss:a study of 51patients[J].Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2003,128:92-98.
[7]	SUCKFULL M.Perspectives on the pathophysiology and treatment of sudden idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss[J].Dtsch Arztebl Int,2009,106:669-675.
[8]	郑虹,戴晴晴,周莲,等.全聋型突发性聋药物治疗的多中心研究[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2013,48(5):379-384.
[9]	BYL F M Jr.Sudden hearing loss:eight years' experience and suggeste prognostic table[J].Laryngoscope,1984,94(5 Pt 1):647-661.
[10]	陈平,唐安洲,郑明华,等.突发性聋不同听力曲线类型的临床特征及疗效分析[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2012,26(22):1043-1046.
[11]	吴继春,刘业海,黄新生,等.治疗前听力曲线形状与突发性聋预后关系分析[J].中华耳科学杂志,2011,9(1):34-37.
[12]	梁振,余力生,夏瑞明.全频突发性聋的分型探讨[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2010,45(4):282-286.
[13]	HONG S M,KO Y G,PARK C H,et al.Analysis of hearing improvement in patients with severe to profound sudden sensorineural hearing lossaccording to the level of pure tone hearing threshold[J].Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol,2012,269:2057-2060.