双模式对人工耳蜗低频段电极不全植入者的言语识别影响

谢展飞, 吴佩娜. 双模式对人工耳蜗低频段电极不全植入者的言语识别影响[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2015, 29(11): 980-983. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2015.11.006
引用本文: 谢展飞, 吴佩娜. 双模式对人工耳蜗低频段电极不全植入者的言语识别影响[J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2015, 29(11): 980-983. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2015.11.006
XIE Zhanfei, WU Peina. The effect of binaural bi-modal fitting on speech recognition of cochlear implant recipients with low frequency electrodes incompletely implanted[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015, 29(11): 980-983. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2015.11.006
Citation: XIE Zhanfei, WU Peina. The effect of binaural bi-modal fitting on speech recognition of cochlear implant recipients with low frequency electrodes incompletely implanted[J]. J Clin Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015, 29(11): 980-983. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2015.11.006

双模式对人工耳蜗低频段电极不全植入者的言语识别影响

  • 基金项目:

    广东省科技计划项目(No:2012B031800408)

    卫生行业科研专项项目(No:201202005)

详细信息
    通讯作者: 吴佩娜,E-mail:linwupeina@hotmail.com
  • 中图分类号: R764.5

The effect of binaural bi-modal fitting on speech recognition of cochlear implant recipients with low frequency electrodes incompletely implanted

More Information
  • 目的:探讨一侧人工耳蜗联合对侧助听器的双模式应用方式对低频段电极不全植入者的言语识别影响。方法:15例非植入耳具有低频残余听力(250 Hz 45~90 dBHL,500 Hz 75~100 dBHL)的语后聋患者,通过人工耳蜗调试软件关闭蜗顶部前3个工作电极,模拟低频段电极不全植入的状态。①低频段电极不全植入状态下同一受试者先后使用单侧人工耳蜗(单CI)和双模式进行言语测试(单音节、双音节、短句),对2种模式下的言语得分结果进行比较。②开启全部电极(全植入状态),同一受试者再次先后使用单CI及双模式进行言语测试,并对低频段电极不全植入状态下2种模式的言语测试得分差值与全植入状态下2种模式得分的差值进行比较。结果:低频段电极不全植入状态下受试者使用双模式后,其言语识别得分高于单CI的言语识别得分(P<0.05)。低频段电极不全植入状态下双模式与单CI的言语识别得分差值大于全植入状态下两者的差值(P<0.05)。结论:低频段电极不全植入者应用双模式刺激后可获得更好的言语识别效果。
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    POTTS L G,SKINNER M W,LITOVSKY R A,et al.Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear(bimodal hearing)[J].J Am Acad Audiol,2009,20:353-373.

    [2]

    YOON Y S,LI Y,FU Q J.Speech recognition and acoustic features in combined electric and acoustic stimulation[J].J Speech Lang Hear Res,2012,55:105-124.

    [3]

    FITZPATRICK E M,SEGUIN C,SCHRAMM D,et al.Users'experience of a cochlear implant combined with a hearing aid[J].Int J Audiol,2009,48:172-182.

    [4]

    ZHU M,WANG X,FU Q J.Development and validation of the Mandarin disyllable recognition test[J].Acta Otolaryngol,2012,132:855-861.

    [5]

    ZHU M,FU Q J,GALVIN J J 3rd,et al.Mandarin Chinese speech recognition by pediatric cochlear implant users[J].Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol,2011,75:793-800.

    [6]

    BASKENT D,SHANNON R V.Interactions between cochlear implant electrode insertion depth and frequency-place mapping[J].J Acoust Soc Am,2005,117(3Pt 1):1405-1416.

    [7]

    亓贝尔,刘博,刘莎,等.人工耳蜗电极植入部位对人工耳蜗使用者言语理解影响的研究[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2011,25(10):441-444.

    [8]

    TALBOT K N,HARTLEY D E.Combined electro-acoustic stimulation:a beneficial union[J]?Clin Otolaryngol,2008,33:536-545.

    [9]

    KOKKINAKIS K,PAK N.Binaural advantages in users of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant devices[J].J Acoust Soc Am,2014,135:L47-L53.

    [10]

    CHING T Y,VAN WANROOY E,DILLON H.Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness:a review[J].Trends Amplif,2007,11:161-192.

    [11]

    MOK M,GALVIN K L,DOWELL R C,et al.Speech perception benefit for children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears and children with bilateral cochlear implants[J].Audiol Neurootol,2010,15:44-56.

    [12]

    ZHANG T,SPAHR A J,DORMAN M F.Frequency overlap between electric and acoustic stimulation and speech-perception benefit in patients with combined electric and acoustic stimulation[J].Ear Hear,2010,31:195-201.

  • 加载中
计量
  • 文章访问数:  52
  • PDF下载数:  32
  • 施引文献:  0
出版历程
收稿日期:  2015-02-01

目录