门诊复位加自我复位治疗后半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕

游锦; 于栋祯; 殷善开; 冯艳梅; 谭俊; 宋强; 陈斌

doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2014.10.007

门诊复位加自我复位治疗后半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕

- 上海交通大学附属第六人民医院耳鼻咽喉科上海交通大学耳鼻咽喉科研究所上海东方耳鼻咽喉科研究所上海交通大学眩晕疾病诊治中心(上海, 200233)
基金项目:
“上海市科委医学引导项目”良性阵发性位置性眩晕的治疗方案研究（No：124119b0300）；十二五"国家科技支撑计划重点项目"耳源性眩晕机制及诊治方法方案研制（No：2012BAI12B00/2012BAI12B02）

详细信息

通讯作者: 陈斌,E-mail:binchendoc@126.com

中图分类号: R441.2

收稿日期: 2013-11-21

Complementary self-treatment for posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

- Department of Otorhinolarynogology, the Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, Otorhinolaryngology Institute of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai Oriental Institute of Otolaryngology, Vertigo Disease Treatment Center of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, 200233, China

More Information

Corresponding author: CHEN Bin, E-mail: binchendoc@126.com

Received Date: 21 November 2013

摘要

摘要: 目的：比较首次治疗时单纯门诊复位法（改良Epley法）与门诊复位加自我复位法（自我改良Epley法）治疗单侧原发性后半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕（PC-BPPV）的疗效。方法：我科眩晕门诊确诊为原发性单侧PC-BPPV的150例患者中，147例符合条件并配合随访。将其随机分为单纯门诊复位组（73例）和门诊复位加自我复位组（74例），前者在门诊采用改良Epley法治疗，后者采用门诊改良Epley法复位加自我复位法（自我改良Epley法）治疗。结果：1周时，单纯门诊复位组治愈率为53.4%，门诊复位加自我复位组治愈率为83.8%（P<0.01）。单纯门诊复位组中，手法复位与复位椅复位成功率分别为45.9%和61.1%（P>0.05），风险比为0.752，95%CI为0.486~1.163；门诊复位加自我复位组中，手法复位与复位椅复位成功率分别为87.5%和81.0%（P>0.05），风险比为1.081，95%CI为0.888~1.316。两组严重不良反应发生率：单纯门诊复位组0，门诊复位加自我复位组为1.3%（P>0.05）。结论：门诊复位配合自我复位比单纯门诊复位法能更快、更有效地治愈后半规管BPPV，能有效地减少患者的就诊次数；两组患者严重不良反应发生率无明显差异。单纯复位椅比手法复位效果更好，但自我复位可减少两种复位方法的效果差距，可用于配合程度较好的后半规管BPPV患者。
- 良性阵发性位置性眩晕 /
- 手法复位 /
- 复位椅 /
- 后半规管 /
- 自我复位
Abstract: Objective: To examine the value of self-treatment for Posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo(PC-BPPV).The treatment effect was compared between patients treated with modified Epley in outpatient clinic combined with self treatment at home and patients treated by modified Epley alone.Method: A randomized controlled trial were carried out in the Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, the Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University from December 2012 to May 2013.147 out of 150 patients with unilateral idiopathic BPPV-PSC were enrolled in follow-up. Among which,73 patients were allocated in modified Epley-alone group and 74 were allocated in slef-treatment group. Result: The success rate was 53.4% in modified Epley-alone group vs 83.8% in self-treatment group(P<0.01)after 1 week treatment.In the modified Epley-alone group,the success rate of hand repositioning group and chair-assisted repositioning group was 45.9% vs 61.1%(P>0.05),the risk rate was 0.752, 95%CI(0.486-1.163). In the self-treatment group, the success rate of hand repositioning group and chair-assisted repositioning group was 87.5% vs 81.0% (P>0.05),the risk rate was 1.081,95%CI(0.888-1.316). Incidence rate of serious complications was 0% in the modified Epley-alone group and 1.3% in the self-treatment group (P>0.05).Conclusion: Complementary self-treatment with modified Epley maneuver treated PC-BPPV sooner and more effectively,Compared with modified Epley maneuver alone.And its incidence rate of serious complications didn't increase. Chair-assisted repositioning showed better result than hand repositioning alone, and self-treatment at home can reduce the effect of the gap. We found that complementary self-treatment with modified Epley maneuver had more benefits for patients with PC-BPPV.
- benign paroxysmal positional vertigo /
- hand repositioning /
- chair-assisted repositioning /
- posterior semicircular canal /
- self-treatment

HTML全文

参考文献(12)

[1]	YON BREVERN M,RADTKE A,LEZIUS F,et al. Epidemiology of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo:fl population study[J].J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,2007,78:710-715.
[2]	季伟华,邹静,李颖. 3270例门诊头晕患者的病因分析[J]. 神经病学与神经康复学杂志,2009,6(1):9-12.
[3]	王武庆,孙琴,任同力等.重复检查对诊断良性阵发性位置性眩晕的意义[J].中华医学杂志,2011,91(46):3254-3256.
[4]	谭俊,于栋祯,冯艳梅,等.复位治疗椅辅助治疗后半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕的疗效观察[J].听力学及言语疾病杂志,2013,21(2):109-111.
[5]	NAKAYAMA M, EPLEY J M. BPPV and variants:improved treatment results with automated nystagmus-based repositioning[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2005,133:107-107.
[6]	中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会,中华医学会耳鼻咽喉科学分会.良性阵发性位置性眩晕的诊断依据和疗效评估(2006年,贵阳)[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2007,42(2):163-163.
[7]	WANG H, YU D, SONG N, et al. Delayed diagnosis and treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo associated with current practice[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol,2014, 271:261-264.
[8]	FROEHLING D A, BOWEN J M, MOHR D N. The canalith repositioning procedure for the treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo:a randomized controlled trial[J]. Mayo Clin Proc,2000,75:695-700.
[9]	SARGENT E W, BANKAITIS A E, HOLLENBEAK C S, et al. Mastoid oscillation in canalith repositioning for paroxysmal positional vertigo[J]. Otol Neurotol,2001,22:205-209.
[10]	[KG*6] TANIMOTO H, DOI K, KATATA K. Self-treatme-nt for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo of the posterior semicircular canal[J]. Neurology,2005,65:1299-1300.
[11]	郭向东,叶放蕾,张治成,等.23例外伤后良性阵发性位置性眩晕临床分析[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2010,24(16):738-739,742.
[12]	POLLAK L, DAVIES R A, LUXON L L. Effectiveness of the particle repositioning maneuver in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo with and without additional vestibular pathology[J]. Otol Neurotol,2002,23:79-83.