Low-temperature plasma assisted via mouth for surgery treating styloid process syndrome
-
摘要: 目的:比较经口入路低温等离子射频辅助手术治疗茎突综合征与传统经口入路扁桃体切除后治疗茎突综合征两者的区别。方法:选取23例茎突综合征患者,其中13例采用经口入路低温等离子射频辅助行茎突截短,10例采用传统扁桃体切除后行茎突截短,比较2种手术方法的手术时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛评分、假膜脱落时间及疗效评价。结果:2种手术方法的手术时间、术中出血量及术后疼痛评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);假膜脱落时间及疗效评价差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。低温等离子手术术后未出现迟发性出血;传统手术术后出现1例迟发性出血。结论:2种手术方法均为治疗茎突综合征的有效方式。但经口入路低温等离子射频辅助手术治疗茎突综合征具有手术时间短、术中出血少及术后疼痛轻等优点,且保留了扁桃体的形态和功能,手术简单方便,视野清楚,操作安全,符合微创理念。Abstract: Objective: To compare the low-temperature plasma assisted way and the traditional method in surgery treating styloid process syndrome.Method: The clinical data from 23 patients who have a typical syndrome and need surgery treating,thirteen patients had been treated by low-temperature plasmaal way and the left cases by traditional one. Comparing operation time,amount of bleeding,degree of pain,time of the fake membrane falling and effort estimating.Conclusion: The difference of operation time,amount of bleeding and degree of pain between low-temperature plasma and tradition in the two operation procedures is significant(P<0.01). But time of the fake membrane falling and effort estimating of low-temperature plasmaal and traditional procedures are found to be similar(P>0.05).And one patient who used the traditional operation bled when he was at home.Conclusion: The two operation procedures are both effective. The low-temperature plasma assisted via mouth for surgery treating elongated styloid process has a big advantage in operation time,amount of bleeding and degree of pain. For the more,it reserves the function and morphology of tonsil;which is more simple,convenient,safe and tiny wound.
-
Key words:
- styloid process syndrome /
- low-temperature plasma /
- tiny wound
-
-
[1] 李菊琴,董明福,胡红蓉,等.改良颈外径路茎突截短术41例报告[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2001,15(9):414-415.
[2] 张庆丰,佘翠萍,李大伟,等.低温等离子射频扁桃体部分切除术治疗儿童阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2011,25(3):114-115.
[3] TEMPLE R H,TIMMS M S.Paediatric coblationtonsillectomy[J].Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol,2001,61:195-198.
[4] 孙正良,刘阳云.手术治疗茎突过长116例临床观察[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2002,16(6):300-300.
[5] 钟贞,肖水芳,王春燕,等.等离子扁桃体切除术与常规剥离法扁桃体切除术之比较[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2006,20(9):391-392,395.
[6] CHINPAIROJ S,FELDMAN M D,SAUNDERS J C,et al.A comparison of monopolar electrosurgery to anew multipolar electrosurgical system in a rat model[J].Laryngoscope,2001,111:213-217.
[7] LIBOON J,FUNKHOUSER W,TERRIS D J.A co-mparison of mucosal incisions made by scalpel,CO2la-ser,electrocautery,and constant-voltage electrocautery[J].Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,1997,116:379-385.
[8] 张庆丰,刘得龙.舌根良性增生性肿物等离子射频消融术[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2009,23(12):529-530,534.
[9] 王浩,汪和平,张德贵,等.保留扁桃体口内途径茎突截短术[J].临床耳鼻咽喉科杂志,2005,19(4):184-184.
[10] 王富华,张克辉,王心涛,等.再缝合法保留扁桃体的口内径路茎突截短术[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2009,16(5):280-280.
[11] PRASAD K C,KAMATH M P,REDDY K J,et al.Elongated styloid process(Eagle's syndrome):a clini-cal study[J].J Oral Maxillofac Surg,2002,60:171-175.
[12] 张庆泉,宋西成,王强,等.外科治疗茎突异常的疗效分析[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2006,41(10):759-762.
-
计量
- 文章访问数: 141
- PDF下载数: 139
- 施引文献: 0